Laserfiche WebLink
Observations/Alternatives: <br />The site currently continues to operate as Fire Station #2. The site is approximately twenty (21) acres and is larger <br />than current needs. The current building does not meet the current space needs of the Fire Department, and much of <br />the building remains vacant while still needing to provide utilities to the vacant portion due to the building systems <br />design. <br />There are a number of outcomes associated with each land use concept. As previously stated, the preference from <br />Open House participants was clearly the single-family concept. A more detailed analysis of the potential outcomes <br />for each concept listed below is attached to this case as 'Data Center Letter'. <br />A single-family development would be consistent with those parcels immediately adjacent to the site. This concept <br />appeared to be well received by the Open House participants, as it was a similar used that they were accustomed to. <br />Other outcomes of a single-family development are additional needs for public infrastructure (roads, utilities, etc.) <br />and increased traffic. As with the case with any future development, the City would need to review these standards <br />to ensure proper infrastructure was created to support the development. These items would need to be mitigated <br />prior to development. <br />In terms of a data center, the land use analysis is more detailed to review compatibility with surrounding land uses. <br />Specific outcomes to the community could include access to additional employment, a higher use of the existing <br />property, larger tax base, and a potential funding source for the replacement of Fire Station #2. Data Centers are <br />becoming increasingly important as technology improves and needs for data storage increase. It is anticipated that <br />there would be less public infrastructure needs (i.e. public roads) to service the area. Other outcomes could include <br />aesthetic, noise, and pollution concerns. Many of these items could be potentially mitigated through an effective <br />zoning ordinance A data center could currently locate in one of the City's existing employment districts. While not <br />formally analyzed by Staff at this point, the City has been told that available employment district parcels are not <br />conducive due to their proximity to the railroad tracks and their impact to the equipment (i.e. vibrations). In <br />addition, available redundant electricity and fiber-optic cables (high speed data) are important factors. Finally, data <br />centers need to be located in close proximity to an electrical substation. <br />Comments were received from Open House attendees as well as written and verbal comments received outside of <br />the Open House. In total, the City received twenty-six (26) comments. Of those that responded, twenty-three <br />(23) preferred the residential concept (88%) and three (3) preferred the data center (12%). A detailed analysis is <br />included in the attached Power Point. Staff received a petition in opposition of a data center development, and in <br />support of a residential development, from surrounding property owners on April 26. Said petition included 69 <br />signatures and has not been reviewed or analyzed by Staff due to the timing of the submittal. Staff will provide an <br />update at the meeting. <br />General common inquiries included, but were not limited to the use of the site as a school, park, or renovated Fire <br />Station #2 in place. There were also multiple inquiries as to whether the data center could be sited elsewhere in the <br />community. It should be noted that the Anoka -Hennepin School District does not currently have plans to develop <br />the site as a school for the foreseeable future. The Parks and Recreation Commission has reviewed park needs for <br />the area in the past, and has focused on safe pedestrian connections to other recreation areas in close proximity. The <br />City continues to review future trail and safe pedestrian connection needs for the area. <br />For those opposed to the data center concept, common comments included concerns with decrease in property <br />value, presence and view of data center being undesirable, compatibility with the character of surrounding <br />properties, noise, and long term risk/potential re -use of the site. <br />For those accepting of a data center, common comments include traffic impacts for residential uses being <br />undesirable as well as residential development reducing the privacy of surrounding property owners (hours of <br />operation). <br />The findings of the Open House will also be presented to the Economic Development Authority (EDA). This is <br />tentatively scheduled for May 16, 2013. The findings and feedback from the Planning Commission and EDA is <br />anticipated to be presented to the City Council at the end of May. As previously stated, there is no formal <br />