My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 05/02/2013
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2013
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 05/02/2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:17:58 AM
Creation date
4/29/2013 3:01:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
05/02/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MEETING COMMENT SHEET <br />Project: <br />Former Municipal Center Land <br />Use Open House <br />Question #1: General Comments <br />General <br />Comments: <br />Meeting Date: <br />Place/Room: <br />Residential Concept <br />• I would prefer residential housing over a <br />data center. The additional residential <br />traffic does not concern me. <br />• Appropriate. <br />• Prefers residential. <br />• Must be single family to continue the <br />concept of community. <br />• Only single-family homes! <br />• I would rather have homes than data <br />center. <br />• Would prefer residential over data center. <br />• The growth in the last 1-2 years has been <br />huge. Why stop now? It's a great place to <br />live. <br />• It would still have a neighborhood feel. <br />• My preference would be residential -single <br />family or public space/park. <br />• Seems to be the better option. Creates <br />more tax dollars without decreasing <br />existing surrounding home values. <br />• This option makes the most sense. The <br />property is already surrounded by houses. <br />• This makes sense, entire community <br />agrees. <br />April 18, 2013 <br />Council Chambers <br />Data Center Concept <br />• There is nothing in terms of berm, trees, or barriers <br />that would make me feel that this option is the best for <br />the neighborhood. <br />• Spot zoning vs. Bill's which would benefit the <br />neighborhood. <br />• Noise. Property values. <br />• Eye sore! Brings down property value. Doesn't make <br />sense in an island surrounded by single-family homes. <br />In danger of'spot-zoning'. Only financial purpose for <br />City. <br />• Eye sore. Drop property value. Loud. Lots of traffic in <br />neighborhood & in front of the school. Pollution, water <br />safety. Is it fenced? Danger for kids outside. Stop signs <br />speed limits. <br />• I will not send my daughter to Ramsey Elementary if <br />the data center goes in. This will no longer be a <br />neighborhood if the data center goes in. <br />• I would rather have homes so the kids have a safe <br />area and for the school. Noise, pollution -water. Not a <br />neighborhood anymore. <br />• Noise, traffic, pollution. What benefits do we as home <br />owners gain from this? Spot zoning, totally. <br />• I am concerned with damage to my property, <br />specifically value and noise. <br />• Lower property value. I didn't buy a home in a <br />residential area to have my kids grow up around <br />warehouses. Air conditioner noises. <br />• If the City wants a data center, work with the owner of <br />the property in the NE corner of Alpine/47. North of <br />Bill's is for sale. *Do not want it in proposed location! <br />• Will definitely depreciate surrounding home values. <br />Eye and ear sore. <br />• Not appropriate for the area. Very concerned w/ noise <br />pollution, air pollution and decreased property value. It <br />makes [no] sense to put an industrial building in the <br />middle of a residential area. <br />• Doesn't flow with surrounding properties. Noise will be <br />an issue. Traffic more of it... Lights will be an issue. <br />Page 1 of 3 <br />G:\ComDev\PROJECTS\FormerMunicipalCenter\OpenHouse\Comments\Comment.OpenHouse.docx <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.