My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 03/19/2013
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2013
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 03/19/2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 11:57:20 AM
Creation date
5/6/2013 1:48:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
03/19/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Kuzma asked if the City charges other fees that are similar to a utility fee. <br />Finance Director Lund stated the City does not currently have a franchise fee on the Connexus <br />utility bill. She explained that in 2003, the City collected $450,000 in a utility fee to replace <br />Local Government Aid the State had cut, but that utility fee sunset after three quarters. <br />Councilmember Elvig stated when the Council instituted that utility fee, residents did not think it <br />would be sunset, but it was. He noted the City charges a stormwater drainage fee and streetlight <br />fee. <br />Finance Director Lund stated the City service bill has fees for recycling, streetlights, and <br />stormwater drainage. The franchise fee under consideration would be on the Connexus utility <br />bill. <br />Acting Mayor Backous stated Connexus is opposed to having a franchise fee because it is on <br />their bill and their customers will think it is a fee from Connexus. He stated he supports a <br />franchise fee because it brings all to the table, including tax - exempt entities that use the roads <br />and bring in traffic. He felt it was fair for those types of properties to also contribute. Acting <br />Mayor Backous stated he did not like the assessment process because residents with 200 feet of <br />road frontage may have one car while others with 100 feet of road frontage may have ten cars. <br />He did not believe the assessment process was fairly tied to use. <br />Finance Director Lund noted property tax is based on value, and not how much you use the road. <br />She stated the 2013 budget includes $1,327,500 in the General Fund budget for roads. This was <br />decreased from $1.5 million when the Riverdale Drive project was dropped. It was noted that <br />another source is Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District 4 but it decertifies in 2014. Finance <br />Director Lund presented a summary of road maintenance funding within the 2013 budget and <br />number of employees that would have to be cut to fund those projects through staff reductions. <br />Councilmember Kuzma asked if a $14 /month franchise fee makes up the $520,000. <br />Finance Director Lund stated at $14 /month it contributes about $1.5 million based on the number <br />of customers from several years ago. <br />Interim Engineer Nelson stated $1.44 million would provide 50% funding for the initiative so the <br />City will have to rely on another revenue source, such as assessments, for the other 50 %. At <br />$28 /month, the initiative would be fully funded. <br />Acting Mayor Backous stated that assumes everything stays flat and asked if it is anticipated <br />there will be property tax increases, population increases, or cost increases. <br />Finance Director Lund noted it could hold funding within the General Fund and address the <br />additional $800,000 that has been found by short-term funding. <br />Acting Mayor Backous stated if the City is funding this level of road projects, it will need to hire <br />additional help so further staff reductions is not a feasible consideration. . <br />City Council Work Session / March 19, 2013 <br />Page 4 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.