My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 05/16/2013
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Economic Development Authority
>
2013
>
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 05/16/2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 12:23:23 PM
Creation date
5/15/2013 10:59:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Economic Development Authority
Document Date
05/16/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Public Open House <br />On April 18, 2013 the City hosted an ("Open House") regarding the future development of the Subject Property. <br />Nearly 250 surrounding property owners were contacted via direct mailings. <br />Comments were received from Open House attendees as well as written and verbal comments received outside of <br />the Open House. In total, the City received twenty-six (26) comments. Of those that responded, twenty-three (24) <br />preferred the residential concept (92%) and three (2) preferred the data center (8%). A detailed analysis is included <br />in the attached Power Point. Staff received a petition in opposition of a data center development, and in support of a <br />residential development, from surrounding property owners on April 26. Said petition included 69 signatures and <br />has not been reviewed or analyzed by Staff. <br />General common inquiries included, but were not limited to the use of the site as a school, park, or renovated Fire <br />Station #2 in place. There were also multiple inquiries as to whether the data center could be sited elsewhere in the <br />community. It should be noted that the Anoka -Hennepin School District does not currently have plans to develop <br />the site as a school for the foreseeable future. The Parks and Recreation Commission has reviewed park needs for <br />the area in the past, and has focused on safe pedestrian connections to other recreation areas in close proximity. The <br />City continues to review future trail and safe pedestrian connection needs for the area. <br />For those opposed to the data center concept, common comments included concerns with decrease in property <br />value, presence and view of data center being undesirable, compatibility with the character of surrounding <br />properties, noise, and long term risk/potential re -use of the site. <br />For those accepting of a data center, common comments include traffic impacts for residential uses being <br />undesirable as well as residential development reducing the privacy of surrounding property owners (hours of <br />operation). <br />Attached to this case is extensive information attained through the public input process. <br />Data Center Prospect Update <br />Over the past few months, Staff has received inquiries from national developers/builders, commercial real estate <br />agents, Connexus Energy and the State of Minnesota regarding the development of the Subject Property for a data <br />center user(s). Although Staff has not worked directly with a data center prospect, the market remains active and <br />interest in the Subject Property remains significant. <br />Observations: <br />Included below are staff comments regarding the public Open House and the revised feasibility study/site concepts. <br />SECTION 1: OPEN HOUSE <br />Concerns listed below were raised at the public Open House regarding the development of the Subject Property for <br />a data center user(s). <br />Noise <br />A number of residents raised concerns regarding the noise generators and air conditioning units would create. <br />Data centers do require significantly sized backup power generators. Additionally, data centers create a significant <br />level of heat due to the extensive use of computer servers; therefore, significant use of air-conditioning units is <br />required. Both types of equipment, generators and air conditioning units, do create noise pollution. <br />Noise pollution concerns can be resolved with proper land use regulations. For example, increased building <br />setbacks, requiring enclosed/indoor storage of generators, requiring air conditioning units to be located at the center <br />of building rooftops and establishing noise restrictions on the Subject Property. <br />For example, the Cities of Anoka and Chaska have noise decibel (dB) restrictions; 65Db and 55dB respectively. <br />The City of Ramsey could consider adopting a noise decibel (dB) restriction on the Subject Property of 55dB. 55dB <br />is often compared to office noise, normal conversation, living room in suburban area, typical business office, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.