Laserfiche WebLink
Public Works Committee 6. 1. <br />Meeting Date: 05/21/2013 <br />By: Bruce Westby, Engineering/Public <br />Works <br />Title: <br />Update on reconstruction requests for Andrie Street <br />Background: <br />Andrie Street's pavement is in poor condition and is in need of reconstruction. In 2008 the city completed a <br />Feasibility Study and prepared plans and specifications for the reconstruction of Andrie Street, which included an <br />alternate bid for constructing sidewalks as part of the project. However, this project was never constructed due to <br />the controversy that arose over whether sidewalks should be constructed or not with the project. A copy of the <br />Feasibility Study is attached. <br />Recently there has been a renewed interest on the part of area residents for reconstructing Andrie Street. Based on <br />preliminary feedback from area residents they favor reconstruction of the street but likely not a new sidewalk. <br />Since the city did complete plans and specifications for this project in 2008 this project could likely be moved <br />forward very quickly if the City Council so desired. <br />Notification: <br />N/A <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />Andrie Street is one of the worst streets in Ramsey in terms of pavement condition and based on the most recent <br />pavement ratings this street should be next in line to be reconstructed after Garnet/168th. Since there is a <br />renewed interest on the part of area residents for reconstructing Andrie Street, staff wanted the Public Works <br />Committee to weigh in on the project, especially considering the history of this project. <br />In 2008, the engineer's estimate to reconstruct the streets (curb and gutter, pavement, storm sewer and turf <br />establishment) was $1.23M, while the low bid came in at $0.90M. To add sidewalks the engineer's estimate was <br />$0.36M, while the low bid came in at $0.22M. However, since that time bituminous prices have risen roughly 30% <br />so the overall project costs would likely be 20-25% higher than in 2008. <br />Alternative # 1 - Provide a recommendation to Council to direct staff to revise the 2008 engineer's estimate to see <br />what estimated costs would be to reconstruct the street and construct sidewalks in 2013. Since the city did complete <br />plans and specifications for this project in 2008 this project could likely be moved forward very quickly if <br />the Public Works Committee recommends that the City Council consider it. <br />Alternative #2 - Provide a recommendation to Council to direct staff to revise the 2008 engineer's estimate to see <br />what estimated costs would be to reconstruct the street in 2013, without constructing sidewalk costs. This option <br />should be chosen if the Public Works Committee feels the project should not include sidewalk construction. Again, <br />since the city did complete plans and specifications for this project in 2008 this project could likely be moved <br />forward very quickly if the Public Works Committee recommends that the City Council consider it. <br />Alternative #3 - Do nothing. <br />Funding Source: <br />