My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 05/28/2013
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2013
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 05/28/2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 9:15:36 AM
Creation date
5/29/2013 11:01:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
05/28/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Place an option to purchase agreement on the two eastern parcels for ten years (which would allow for phase <br />II of the proposed project --see phase II map) <br />Prospect Foxtrot, the EDA, the State and City Staff have reviewed the proposed solution and support moving the <br />project forward. <br />Because the Prospect Foxtrot would like to vacate their current location as soon as possible, the City of Ramsey <br />will need to efficiently respond to the proposed project/prospect. A number of items need to happen in order to <br />move the proposed project forward quickly; please reference the attached timeline. Therefore, Staff will be <br />requesting Council authorization to begin a number of processes on May 28. <br />Lastly, Prospect Foxtrot has indicated interest in City financial assistance for the proposed project (known as a <br />"Business Subsidy). Staff is working with the prospect now to attain detailed information on said request. It is <br />likely Prospect Foxtrot will be requesting a land write down (reduced land sale price). <br />It is not uncommon practice for City's to financially assist economic development projects in some fashion. The <br />City of Ramsey recruited a majority of its larger employers (located in Ramsey's Industrial Parks) utilizing business <br />subsidies; specifically, TIF land write downs. Staff would like to discuss this topic with the City council. Staff <br />needs to understand if the City Council has an appetite to receive a request for a business subsidy from prospect <br />Foxtrot. The City has adopted policies on businesses subsidies; which Staff intends to utilize (see attached business <br />subsidy policy). Receiving a request does not obligate the City Council to a business subsidy. NOTE: The <br />EDAbriefly reviewed this case on May 16 and invited Prospect Foxtrot to submit a formal request for a business <br />subsidy. <br />Recommendation: <br />Staff had a chance to meet with Prospect Foxtrot representatives and tour their existing facility. It is Staff <br />observation Prospect Foxtrot is a quickly growing successful business with a strong outlook. Prospect Foxtrot can <br />provide new tax base, new jobs and a quality business campus for the City of Ramsey. Additionally, it is possible <br />to structure an economic development agreement to provide a partial funding source for the future public works <br />campus. Lastly, a number of the Public Works campus parcels were identified as surplus City owned land in 2012; <br />and are currently tax exempt. Developing the Public Works campus would partially achieve a previous Council <br />strategic goal --reduce the inventory of surplus City owned land. <br />Because Prospect Foxtrot's timeline (phased approach) matches with the City's timeline to vacate the current public <br />works campus (may require discussion), Staff believes the proposed solution is logical/beneficial and should be <br />considered by the City Council for approval as outlined below. <br />1. Provide Staff with general direction regarding the proposed project <br />2. Provide Staff with general direction regarding economic development assistance <br />3. Authorize Staff to introduce Sale Ordinances (5/28/2013 Regular Session)** <br />4. Authorize Staff to introduce ordinance to vacate right -of -way (6/11/2013 Regular Session)* * <br />**If the proposed project doesn't move forward, the City is NOT put in a compromising position by passing <br />ordinances now. Said ordinances do not obligate the City to sell land or vacate ROW; they simply ALLOW the City <br />to do so. Prospect Foxtrot will need to enter into a formal purchase agreement with the City and complete a formal <br />vacation of ROW application before either action is can move forward. The Council will have a chance to <br />review/approve both items. However, waiting to begin the ordinance process will push the project timeline out; and <br />could potentially make the proposed Ramsey solution unrealistic for the prospect. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.