08/01/89 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Tile Commission noted that streets were platted at a 60 foo; right-of-way rather than the required 06 feet. Mr. Pelerson noted that he has developed in many metro communities and Ramsey is the only one thal requires 66 tcet street right-o:-way. Commission Deemer stated that he believes tile sewer trunk is ",aligned alonp_ the east sidz of the wetland, within 100 yards of Chestnut Hills and suggested that the City Engi~mer review whether extending services to Chestnut Hills from that point would be a better alignment. Ix'lr. Johnson stated that Mr. Bud Sttuter is willing to provide easements for an access south of Hunter's Hill to CD'. Rd. #57; the problem area to be resolved is who will be responsible for street construction costs through the Sauter property. Mr. Banwan stated that the proposed park area and trails have been addressed by the Park Commission; the Commission does want to see an ag~egate of the parks and trails for all three developments (Windemere Woods, Chestnut Hills and Ceciar Hills). Motion by Commissioner LaDue and seconded by Commissioner and seconded by Commissioner Bawden to recommend preliminary plat approval of Chestnut Hills with tile following conditions: Receipt of a favorable response from thc U.S. Army Corps of Engineer's regarding the considered park area. o Developer resolving street access to Sunfish Lake Blvd. via Sunfish Lake Drive in the northwest portion of the plat and access via the proposed Cedar Hills Addition to a major thoroughfare out of me southwest portion of Cedar Hills Addition. o Developer complying with the City Engineer's report dated July 17, 1989; especially Item 2 (75' water frontage requirement), Item 3 (90' width on corner lots), Item 4 (66' street right-of-way) and Item 7 (easement and maintenance agreement for common driveway). With regard to Item 3, the Commission does not recommend granting variances to lot widths with the exception of those lots abutting the bike/pedestrian wa3'. Further, that the Park Commission should have an opportunity to view the entire parks scheme for the Cedar Hills, Chestnut Hills and Windemere Woods Additions. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Zimmerman, Commissioners Bawden, Deemer, LaDue, Hendriksen and Terry. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Shumway. Case #7: Request For Preliminary Plat Approval Of Cedar Hills Addition; Case of Mr. Wally Anderson of ARADCO, Inc.: Mr. Wall,,, Anderson was present requesting preliminary plat approval of Cedar Hills. The Commission proceeded to review the preliminary plat and the City Engineer's report dated July 18, 1989. Mr. Anderson referred to Item #2 of the City Engineer's report and indicated that lot lines will be redrawn so that the lots meet the 80 foot width requirement. Planning & Zoning Con'm-fission/July 18, 1989 Page 3 of 11