09/05/89 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

MEETING l-,.t,(,At,,kNk: L TE ?TRiZE'I ~,.'~ Mr. RaatiLf::: seated tha: De: Council direction, he has p, reoared a brief report regarding thc m 22 feet wide and consists of a sand su~age wit~, x'e~ ie~ di~ch:::- cxisung i~: the area. The total figh~-of-wi:y for Ute S=eet consists of 30 tcet. if Otz S~ec: were to ac upg~ao:d, the rigN-of-way should be increased to 50 fee~ and the road cons~c~cd 26 fee: wide wi~ 24 foot riding surface and a I foo~ be~ o:~ each side. The pu~ose i; cons~uetin~ the road 26 fee~ wide versus 28 feet would ~ to avoid having to remove mature =ms in the ama. In accordance with the City's cugent assessmem policy, the improvements would t~ to the benefitting property owners. The total esfimat~ cost for the projec~ is $26,503. The number of units to be assessed is 10. The estimated cost per unit is $2~0 or $~5 per unit amortized o,:er 10 ve~s. Mr. Raatikha then mad: a slide presentatf~m of Ute Stree: in if': existing condition and others streets indicative of what would be p: oposed for Ute Mr. Raatikka stated up~ading Ute S~ee: as descfibzd would require acquiring anothv' 10 fec~ of right-of-way on each side of the road. Drainage improvements would have to be studied more c~efully in a feasibiliu' report. to~m~ discussed. A resident inquired as to why up~ading Ute Street is ' -" S Linda Wolf bauer - 49.47 179th Lane - Stated thru upon her request, Council reouested a preliminary stud.',' regarding up~ading Ute Street. Ute Street in it's presen,, cond'ition has been a constan: problem, source of irritation and presents some safety concerns. There are drainage problems in the area and tile road is not equ':dly shared by residents on both sides of the su'eet. Mr. Raatikka stated that in order for this project to prozeed any. further, the affected residents would have to submit a petition to City Council reouestin~ a feasibility study be prepared regarding up~ading Ute Street. Lois Hanson - 18026 Ute Street - Inquired if Ute Street could be just up~aded to a Class 5 surface. Mr. Raati 'kka replied that it is possible to just bring Ute Street up to Class 5 standards but without the construction of ditches, there will still be washouts in the area. Up~ading to Class 5 would also be assessed to the benefitting property owners. Jeff Rockow- 18015 Ute Street - Stated that he doubts even the construction of ditches will alleviate drainage problems in the area. Mr. Raatikka replied that a feasibility report would study the drainage in the area. Ron Nelson - 18055 Ute Street - Inquired if the turn-aroud would also be expanded. Mr. Raatik. ka replied that the turn-around would be expanded to at least 60 feet in diameter. Angela Lenarz - 4925 179th Lane - Stated that her propzrty always getls flooded with oil and it isn't fair. Linda Wolfbauer - Noted that the residents on the west side of Ute are already subject to a Ciry Council/August 15, 1989 Page 3 of 8