Laserfiche WebLink
Case ~/3: Reques! For A Conditional <br /> Actdiiional l~eli~er,~ ~ruck ir'or A <br /> Business: C~se (;I Arnold <br /> <br />Ms. Froiik fcc'ailed that or. July 25, 1989. Council tabled z~ctio~: ~(, approve Mr. <br />reques~ fo.'-' an amended condJtfona', use permi~ until inpm was rc.',,cived from Mr. <br />reg~trding i~ours of operation, iX(tr. }ilar has requested flint hours of epera:~m: be specified <br />at ?:0(~ a.n',, to 7:0(1 p.m., Monday through Saturday and noon to ?:(D p.m. on Sundays. <br /> <br />Motion by Counciimcmber Peterson and second~ by Counciln'~emt',:'7 Ciclt to approve <br />Klm-'.,, request fo:' an amended conditional usc permit fo: thc firewoo~ sales busines~ <br />16020 Potassium Street N.W. ~o increase the number of vehicles from 3 ~o 4: to specify <br />rela~cd cqtfipmem tha~ wil1 be allowed on the sutliem property: ~(, scl hours of operation: <br />and to impiemenl woodpile footprint ~enns as presented on July 25. I989 in Fi~u:'e A. <br />This psmai~ sim!l ttd~c precedence over th::: pemai~ issued ~(, Mt. K~ar in 19i;4. <br /> <br />Motion carried. <br />and Peterson. Voting No: NOn~. <br /> <br />C~se #4: <br /> <br />Review lndependen! Auditor's Repot!, Manai2emen! Letler and <br />Cily's Response: <br /> <br />Mr. t,[enneth 5.'loliov of Pannell. Kc= Forster was present and reviewed the <br />Letter relating io the 1988 audit with Council. ix"n~. Mollov noted ti~at as in tile past, tn~ <br />turnover of personnel in the Finanee Department together w,~ other difficulties resulted <br />accounting records were not in order in 1988 and the accounting system is not operating <br />anywhere near where it should be. ?to,ess is slo,a' to correct the situation and the City <br />needs to evaluate it's personnel needs. <br /> <br />Finance Officer Ashley noted that the C~tx s response to the Management Letter dated <br />August 2, 1988 indicates that ,-.. number of steps are in place to co=cci deficiencies ir. the <br />accounting system and accounting records. <br /> <br />Case #5: <br /> <br />Review Status Of Homes In The City's Municipal Water And <br />Sewer District That Do Not Have Remote Readers Installed: <br /> <br />The City requires that remote readers be installed with each meter for homes within the <br />City's municipal water and sewer dis~ct. Many homes were finaled without an cperative <br />remote. The builders of those homes were notif~M and in most instances, the builders have <br />made arrangements for installation of operative remote readers. There are currently 5 <br />homes that do not have remote readers installed and the builders have not responded to the <br />City's notification to do so. CiLv Staff recommends thai the City make arrangements for <br />correcting the situation if the builders do not do so by September 5, 1989; the builder will <br />be responsible for the cost to make the corrections and failure to pa.',' such charges within <br />30 days wilt result in a review of the contractor's license. <br /> <br />City Council/August 8, 1989 <br /> Page 7 of 10 <br /> <br /> <br />