Laserfiche WebLink
P, amsey City Planning Board <br /> <br />J~u~ust &, ~¥oo <br /> <br />s ys~l]~O~_~gul~f:£~m~-~___~.~--ompl{ ~h-{t~'-ex~re s s ed- intent, ~r <br /> <br />tl~.~ec~n- 1 ?0~0II ZD"(c)--s~tes <br /> ~,~evel~men~nsn De conducted so that the <br /> maximm number of trees are preserved~7~ <br /> <br />~ea~nd'natural Ciearing~'T ~ i" ............ <br /> <br />We are concerned that the siz._~e and n.___~_kber of <br />river frontage lots not be determined by the num- <br />ber of available clekrings, because reasonable <br />valu._.~e will be achieved only if lots can be platted <br />in an orderly manner at the frontage allowed by <br />the ordinance. If the number of lots is limited to <br />the number of available clearings, the number of <br />potential lots may be substantially reduced result- <br />ing in substantial money loss to land owners. <br /> <br />~ the tl~i~sitl;-i>i tree%?' utilizing <br />of a minimum o£ 1-3/4" diameter measured one <br /> <br />foot above the ~round .... <br /> <br />ca,p~-ma~ll-tla~e;~_e_n~O treeS-per aC¥~' <br /> <br /> .~ ...... v.~--.~ .......... .~ ........ t~e' ex~stml~' crown <br />c~.greater .than 50~0 .... " <br /> <br />We are concerned as to which of these provisions <br /> <br />"in no case need density exceed 10 trees <br />]>er acre" or <br /> <br /> 2. "Development shall not reduce the existing <br /> crown cover greater than 50.0~0 . , ." <br /> <br /> e are concerned because some of our acreage is <br /> quite wooded with smaller trees, a substantial <br /> amount, o~ need to be cleared to make <br />reent lots. <br /> <br /> are also concerned, that the ordinance should <br /> not require the.~~ of any trees~ which need <br /> to be removed because of serious storm damage, <br /> disease or other acts of God. <br /> <br /> <br />