My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 04/30/2013 - Joint with Anoka CC
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2013
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 04/30/2013 - Joint with Anoka CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 11:59:51 AM
Creation date
6/17/2013 9:47:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Title
Joint with Anoka CC
Document Date
04/30/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Backous asked what started this process. <br />Councilmember Weaver said this was reviewed over a year ago and that Representative Abeler <br />was going to carry the bonding bill but we were not ready yet but that Jamie Schurbon (Anoka <br />Conservation District) felt strongly that it is being driven by the Conservation District and the <br />deadline for the grant application. <br />3.04: River & Shoreland Regulations <br />Development Services Manager Gladhill stated that in 2009 the Legislature authorized <br />rulemaking to protect the shoreland along the Mississippi River that received a lot of pushback <br />because not one size fits all cities along the River. He said the rules are included in the current <br />Legacy Omnibus Bill but that Ramsey has not reviewed it yet so they are unsure of their our <br />position. He said the northwest group bonded together the last time with benefits to Ramsey but <br />that they need to review this more before a resolution can be considered by the Council. <br />Mayor Strommen asked if this bill includes new rulemaking or is being picked up from last time. <br />Councilmember Weaver said the rulemaking continues from last time but that no sunset date is <br />included on completion. <br />Development Services Manager Gladhill said the bill is in the House now and that there is lots of <br />background data on what the regulations are. <br />Planning Director Braun said the last version included definitions but are not included now, <br />adding there is language that the DNR needs to incorporate and industrial aspects too. <br />Councilmember Weaver said they say they have toned down the rules but have really made them <br />more onerous, affecting the Rum River and making us comply with MNRA rules. He said their <br />plan for the Thurston interchange and the tight diamond along Kings Island is half a mile from <br />the River and that the plan was rejected because it encroached in the MNRA area 600 square <br />feet. Councilmember Weaver said these rules result in making all properties on the river non- <br />conforming and that variances will be required for gardens, etc., that have to have a 50 -foot <br />buffer. <br />Development Services Manager Gladhill said they need to do more work on educating both <br />Councils on where the rules are starting from. <br />Mayor Strommen said this is not in the Senate yet but that they will know when it is on the floor. <br />Councilmember Schmidt said there is not much chance for public input as they have already <br />spent funds for this. <br />Councilmember Weaver noted that anything could happen at the conference committee. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.