Laserfiche WebLink
This case was deleted from the agenda at the applicant's request. <br /> <br />Case #6: Request For Preliminary Plat Approval Of Northfork 3rd Addition; <br /> Case Of Mr. Dennis Peck: <br /> <br />Mr. Otto rej,clrt that all the City has received at this point is the sketch plan and no: the Freliminar>.' <br />plat infom~ation. At this time, no decision has been made to include or delete fi~e proi~osed golf <br />course from the total land area to be considered for park dedication requkcments. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Holm and seconded by Comn-fi~:'ioner LaDu: to table prelimin:'try plat <br />approval of Northfork 3rd Addition until suc[~ time as the necessary information h:~s been <br />submitted by the applicant and reviewed by the City Engineer. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Zimmennan, Commissioners Hendriksen, LaDue, Holm <br />and Terry. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #8: Request For Site Plan Review; Case of Mr. Gene Brown: <br /> <br />Mr. Banwart stated that Mr. Brown is proposing to expand a 54'x108' existing, storage building <br />by 5~'x52'. City Code requires 50% of the exterior walls being other than metal; the exis,ting <br />building does not meet that exterior wall specification; City Staff is recommending that the bui~iding <br />expansion be approved with metal to be consistent with the existing building. <br /> <br />The Commission proceeded to review the City En~neer's report. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding whether or not Ramsey's policy requires perimeter frost footings <br />versus poles set on cement pads for metal buildings in the commercial and indusn-ial districts. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Holm and seconded by Commissioner LaDue to recommend approval of <br />Mr. Gene Brown's proposed site plan with the following conditions: <br /> <br />a) <br />b) <br /> <br />c) <br />d) <br />e) <br /> <br />Outdoor lighting arranged to deflect light away from Ct5'. Hwy. #116 and Basalt St. N.~,'~. <br />The exterior wall finish not being required to meet the 50% other than metal requirement2o._ <br />allow for consistency between the existing building and the expansion. <br />Providing a de~led landscaping plan. <br />Providing a topo~aphical map, g'rading pla_n, an~t t3.,pical cross section of the concrete pad. <br />Hard surfacing the existing driveway. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Zimmerman, Commissioners LaDue, Hendriksen, Holm <br />and TenD'. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Shumway. <br /> <br />Case #3: Review Sketch Plan For Dellwood Hills Addition: <br /> <br />Jeff Caine presented a sketch plan for Dellwood i-iills which consists of 24 acres on Bison Sweet <br />south of Ct),. Rd. #63 proposed to be subriivided into nine 2.5 acre lots. The lots would be <br />accessed by an 1100 foot long cul-de-sac which would require a va-lance to cul-de-sac length. <br /> <br />Chakm-mn Zimmerman noted that ali lots on the south half of the proposed subdivision would have <br />double street frontage if 171st Avenue to the west of Bison is extended as indicated on the half <br />section maps. <br /> <br />Planning & Zoning Commission/April 4, 1989 <br /> Page 5 of 12 <br /> <br /> <br />