My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 09/14/1989
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
1989
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 09/14/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 10:15:55 AM
Creation date
11/19/2003 3:18:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
09/14/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~ Request for sketch Dian review of Haubrich Addition: cas~ ~f John <br /> i]nd Marilyn Haubrich. <br /> <br />Merland Otlo informed the Commission that Staff was recommendin~ that park dedication be <br />satisfied by a combination of land and cash. <br /> <br />The consensus of the Commission was to recommend that the City Council require a 8' X 20' <br />strip of land along County Road 5 and the development of a 8' by 609' walkway to satisfy park <br />dedication requirements for Haubrich Addition. <br /> <br />ReQuest for Sketch Piton Rrtvi~w for Sortebera's 6th Addition: case <br />of Allen Sorteberq. <br /> <br />Merland Otto informed the Commission that Staff's recommendation was to aquire lots ! and 2 or <br />3 and 4 to satisfy park dedication. <br /> <br />Acting Chairman Hetland asked Mr. Sorteberg which lots he taught would work out better. <br /> <br />Mr. Sorteberg told the Commission that he felt lots 3 and 4 would be better because they are <br />more secluded then the other, lots 1 and 2 have houses very close. <br /> <br />The consensus of the Commission is lo recommend that City Council require lots 3 and 4, block 3 <br />to satisfy park dedication for Sorteberg's 6th addition. <br /> <br />Case #4 Beview Park Plans for Cedar Hills. Chestnut Hills i~nd Windemere <br /> ~oods Addition. <br /> <br />The consensus of the Commission was to table this issue. <br /> <br />Case #5 Review resolution approving Policy Governino Appointments to <br /> Boards and Commissions in the City of Ramsay, <br /> <br />Acting Chairman Hetland asked the Commission if they had any ideas regarding the issue of one <br />person being on more than one Commission. <br /> <br />A discussion ensued and the consensus of the Commission was that they feel a person should be on <br />only one Commission al a time. <br /> <br />Case #6 .Review and Discus8 Update8 to Park and Recreation Element to <br /> .Ra. msey's Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />The consensus of the Commission was to table this issue awaiting further information from City <br />Council. <br /> <br />PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION/AUGUST 10, 1989 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.