Laserfiche WebLink
Case ~3: Rcquesl For A ('ondilionat Usc Permil 7-{ Maintain <br /> Additional l~,,,li~cr~ 7tuck For A florae Fircwood Sales <br /> bustness, Cast. ('I Arnold Klar: <br /> <br />Ms. Frolik rccalied that o~. July 25, 1989, Council tabled :~ction <br />recmesl fo:' an amended conditJona! use permit until inpu: was rt-::eived from Mr. }Oar <br />regardi~,f, hours of operation· Mr. Klm- has requested fha,, hours of operation be specified <br />at 7:0',i a.n:. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday and noon to 7:00 p.m. on Sunciavs. <br /> <br />Motion by Counciimem~r Peterson and seconded by Councilmember Cite to approve Mr. <br />}[lar's request for an amended conditional usc permit for the flrewoo,f sales business at <br />16020 Potas',,ium Street N.W. to increase the number of vehicles from 3 to 4: to :~pecify <br />rchnc(': equipment tha~ will bc allowed on the su~iect property: to set hours of operation: <br />and to impiemen: v,'oodpile footprim mnus as 'oresented on July 25, 1989 in Figure A. <br />Thi? m:mnh ::im!] take r~rccedencc over tim: pemai: issued to Mr. if. far in ] 9~';4. <br /> <br />Motion earned. Vom~g Yes: Mayor Reimann. Counciimembers DcLuca, Pearson. Cici; <br />and Peterso,u. \ om~ No: <br /> <br />Case #4: <br /> <br />Review Independent Auditor's Report, Management Letter and <br />C~t.~ s Response: <br /> <br />Mr. Kenneth Mollov of Pannell, Ke~ Forster was present and reviewed the Mana7emen~ <br />Lexer retatinf_ m the 1988 audi~ witk~ Council. kk. Mollov noted tim~ as in the past, ',nc <br />turnover of personnel in the Finance Department together wi~ other difficulties resulted in <br />accounting records were not in order in 1988 and the accounting system is not operating <br />anvwhere near where it should be. Pro~ess is slow to correct the situation and the Cit-,, <br />needs to evaluate it's personnel needs. <br /> <br />Finance Officer Ashley noted that the City's response to the Managemen! Letter dated <br />August 2. 1988 indicates that a number of stess are in place to correct deficiencies in the <br />accounting system and accounting records. <br /> <br />Case #5: <br /> <br />Review Status Of Homes In The City's Municipal V,:ater And <br />Sewer District That Do Not Have Remote Readers Installed: <br /> <br />The City requires that remote readers be installed with each meter for homes within the <br />City's municipal water and sewer alisa:rice. Many homes were finaled without an eperafive <br />remote, The builders of those homes were notified and in most instances, the builders have <br />made m-rangements for installation of operative remote readers. There are cu~ently 5 <br />homes that do not have remote readers installed and the builders have no: responded to the <br />City's notification to do so. C/tv Staff recommends thru the Cit.,,' make arrangements for <br />correcting the situation if the builders do not do so by September 5, 1989; the builder will <br />be responsible for the cost to make the corrections and failure to pay such charges within <br />30 days will result in a review of the coat:factor's l~cense. <br /> <br />City Council/August 8, 1989 <br /> Page 7 of 10 <br /> <br /> <br />