My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 10/12/1989
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
1989
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 10/12/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 10:16:01 AM
Creation date
11/19/2003 3:26:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
10/12/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
200
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ramsey City l~lanning Board <br /> <br />-2- August <br /> <br />~a~a~---~.i,W=,....T~. ~_~--, . .._ __ _. <br /> ~ment~hal! be conducted so that the <br /> maximunn number of trees are preserved~ <br /> <br /> ~ea,~na'natural'~learing~ . .~"" <br /> <br /> ~e are concerned tha~ the 8~z~ an~ n~b~r of <br /> river fron~age lo~8 not be determined by the n~- <br /> bet of available clearing~, because reasonable <br /> va]u~ will be achieved only ~f lo~s can be pla~ed <br /> in an orderly manner ~t ~he frontage allowed by <br /> the ordinance. If the n~ber of lo~s is l~mi~efl to <br /> ~he number of available clear~ngs, the number of <br /> potential lo~ may be s~bstan~ially re~uced result- <br /> ing in substantial money lo88 to land owner~. <br /> <br />~ 'the adhstty'~ tree~7' utilizing nu~'~'s <br />of a minimum of 1-3/4" diameter measured one <br /> <br />foot above the ground .... <br /> <br />c ~"~]greater .than <br /> <br />We are concerned as to which of these provisions <br />contro!£ t~c Other; Lh~ o~di,,~nc~ ~hm~ld ~her:~ <br /> <br />"in no case need density exceed 10 trees <br />per 2. ere~l or <br /> <br /> Z. "Development shall not reduce the existing <br /> <br /> qlV crown cover greater than 50.?% . . ." <br /> <br /> e are concerned b..ecaus,e so_me of our acreage is <br /> uite w~with smaller trees, a substantial <br /> <br />~l(~ ent lots. <br /> -We are also concerned, that the ordinance should <br /> not require the rear of any trees which need <br /> t;o be removed 'because of serious storm damage, <br /> disease or other acts of God. <br /> <br />1983 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.