My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 12/14/1989
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
1989
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 12/14/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 10:16:15 AM
Creation date
11/19/2003 3:55:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
12/14/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~P STATE OF <br /> EPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br /> <br />~TRO REGION WATERS - 1200 W~ER RO~, ST. PA~, ~ 55106 <br /> <br />PHONE NO. 296-7523 FILE NO. <br /> <br />October 12, 1989 <br /> <br />Mr. Jeffrey Caine <br />Caine & Associates Land Surveyors <br />17720 Highway 65 <br />Ham Lake, MN 55304 <br /> <br />RE: SKETCH PLAN FOR TROTT BROOK PONDS, PROTECTED WETLAND 2-323W, <br /> CITY OF RAMSEY, 'ANOKA COUNTY <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Caine: <br /> <br />Based on my review of your sketch plan and on my October 4, 1989 <br />field inspection of the site in question, I have the following <br />comments relating to Trott Brook Ponds. <br /> <br />The ordinary hi§h water level (OHW) of wetland 2-323W exists at <br />approximately elevation 871.0'. MAnnesota Rules, part 6115.0190, <br />subpart 3 prohibits the placement of fill to create upland areas; <br />and prohibi:s fill to construct roadways or pathways, or to create <br />or improve land accesses from peripheral shorelands to islands; or <br />to facilitate land transportation across the waters. A road project <br />can be proposed, however, by a federal, state or local government <br />agency. The fill prohibition may be waived provided that: <br /> <br /> 1) there is no other feasible or practical alternative to the <br /> project that would have less environmental impact; and <br /> 2) the public need for the project rules out-the no-build <br /> alternative. <br /> <br />Since there is upland to the north of the wetland, in the northeast <br />corner, there is a feasible and practical alternative to the wetland <br />crossing as shown on the plan. This rule ,would also eliminate any <br />possibility of filling as proposed in Lot 23, Block 3. <br /> <br />AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.