Laserfiche WebLink
Ramsey Town Center Traffic Analysis <br />Traffic Impacts <br />Traffic impacts from the proposed project were determined by analyzing intersection operations for the <br />future conditions. The intersection analyses were conducted for all the study area intersections using <br />Highway Capacity Manual" procedures that report a Level of Service at each intersection. The Level of <br />Service is a measure of average operating conditions at intersections and ranges from A through F, with <br />each level defined by a range of control delay per vehicle. Signalized intersections and all -way stop <br />control are analyzed for total intersection delay, while two-way stop control is analyzed only for minor <br />approach delay. Table 2 summarizes the Level of Service Criteria. Conditions A, B, and C are considered <br />excellent to good operating conditions with control delay per vehicle ranging up to 35 seconds for LOS C. <br />Level of Service D is a generally acceptable standard for planning and design of urban transportation <br />facilities. At Level of Service E, poor intersection operations occur as traffic volumes approach capacity <br />and LOS F (Control Delay > 80 sec/veh) represents extremely congested conditions. <br />Table 2: LOS Criteria <br />TSignalized AWSC & TWSC <br />Intersections Intersections <br />Control Delay Control Delay <br />(sec/veh) (sec/veh) <br />A <= 10 0-10 <br />B >10-20 >10-15 <br />C > 20- 35 > 15- 25 <br />D > 35- 55 > 25- 35 <br />E > 55- 80 > 35- 50 <br />F > 80 > 50 <br />Source: Highway Capacity Manual 2000 <br />For intersections operating under two-way stop control (TWSC), LOS is defined for each minor <br />movement rather than for the intersection as a whole. Intersections operating as All -way Stop Controlled <br />(AWSC) use the same thresholds for defining LOS. The LOS criteria for TWSC and AWSC Intersections <br />are also shown in Table 2. Table 3 shows the results of the capacity analyses at the study area <br />intersections for Existing conditions and for both Future scenarios. The Appendix of this report contains <br />the capacity analysis worksheets. <br />Existing Conditions <br />Under existing conditions, the intersection of TH 10 and Sunfish Lake Boulevard is operating in <br />substandard conditions (worse than LOS D) in the PM peak hour. The other intersections are operating in <br />good conditions in both peak hours. However, the analysis of conditions at TH 10 and Ramsey and <br />Armstrong Boulevards indicates that conditions are unstable, particularly in the PM peak hour when the <br />Ramsey and Armstrong approaches are at LOS F and E respectively. Left turns from TH 10 are also at <br />LOS F and E respectively at these intersections. Under these conditions, moderate increases in volumes <br />on either Ramsey or Armstrong Boulevard or left turning from TH 10 would cause conditions to <br />deteriorate similar to what is currently experienced at Sunfish Lake Boulevard and the intersections could <br />quickly move into LOS E and F. <br />" Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C. <br />March 2003 Meyer. Mohaddes Associates. Inc. <br />15 <br />