Laserfiche WebLink
The following table presents five years of comparative operating results for each of the City's utility <br />enterprise funds: <br />Utility enterprise funds <br />Water <br />Operating revenue <br />Operating expenses <br />Operating income <br />Sewer <br />Operating revenue <br />Operating expenses <br />Operating income <br />2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 <br />$ 1,539,665 $ 1,693,581 $ 1,633,461 <br />1,247,248 1,291,952 1,295,721 <br />$ 1,208,843 <br />883,214 <br />$ 1,214,953 $ 1,261,609 <br />1,076,451 1,101,554 <br />$ 1,821,386 $ 2,131,460 <br />1,358,050 1,228,012 <br />$ 292,417 $ 401,629 $ 337,740 $ 463,336 $ 903,448 <br />Operating income as a % <br />of operating revenue 19.0 % 23.7 % 20.7 % 25.4 % 42.4 % <br />$ 1,236,771 <br />1,149,318 <br />$ 1,324,342 <br />1,152,760 <br />$ 325,629 $ 138,502 $ 160,055 $ 87,453 $ 171,582 <br />Operating income as a % <br />of operating revenue 26.9 % 11.4 % 12.7 % 7.1 % 13.0 % <br />Street Light <br />Operating revenue $ 183,560 $ 172,897 $ 179,272 $ 178,850 $ 179,124 <br />Operating expenses 123,839 148,140 158,369 163,758 165,651 <br />Operating income $ 59,721 $ 24,757 $ 20,903 $ 15,092 $ 13,473 <br />Operating income as a % <br />of operating revenue 32.5 % 14.3 % 11.7 % 8.4 % 7.5 % <br />Recycling <br />Operating revenue $ 332,682 $ 284,515 $ 294,617 $ 297,226 $ 296,358 <br />Operating expenses 300,755 298,631 307,662 302,947 302,936 <br />Operating income (loss) $ 31,927 $ (14,116) $ (13,045) $ (5,721) $ (6,578) <br />Operating income as a % <br />of operating revenue 9.6 % (5.0) % (4.4) % (1.9) % (2.2) % <br />Storm Water <br />Operating revenue $ 566,506 $ 578,666 $ 617,598 $ 617,579 $ 647,169 <br />Operating expenses 300,444 358,522 350,521 410,666 496,309 <br />Operating income $ 266,062 $ 220,144 $ 267,077 $ 206,913 $ 150,860 <br />Operating income as a % <br />of operating revenue 47.0 % 38.0 % 43.2 % 33.5 % 23.3 % <br />As displayed in the table above, each of the individual enterprise funds was able to report positive <br />operating results for the year ended December 31, 2012, with the exception of the recycling fund. This <br />loss was covered by the County Recycling Grant which typically subsidizes these operations. <br />The most significant change in operating income results compared to prior year occurred in the Water <br />Utility Fund. The increase in Water Utility Fund operating revenue is a combination of a 2 percent rate <br />increase along with an increase in usage as a result of the dry watering season. <br />