Laserfiche WebLink
Resolutions #89-02-24, #89-02-25, #89-02-26, #89-02-27 and #89-02-28 ordering <br />feasibility repons for the follov,,ing sealcoating projects in 1989: <br /> <br />153rd Avenue N.W. between CSAH 5 and Hwy. No. 47; <br />Rodeo Hills; <br />Beaudry% Second Addition; <br />153rd Avenue N.W. between Cry. Rd. #83 and Puma Street; <br />153rd Avenue N.W, between Hwy. No. ,47 and Roanoke Street. <br /> <br />/,,'lotion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Reimann, Councilmembers DeLuca, Pearson, Cich <br />and Peterson. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Council directed that a subsequent Council meeting should include discussion of whether <br />or not to continue the City's policy of assessing major street maintenance costs to the <br />benefitting property owners. <br /> <br />Council recessed at 9:00 p.m. <br /> <br />Mayor Reimann called the meeting back to order at 9:15 p.m. <br /> <br />Case 4/13: Trunk Sl(~rm Sewer Improvement Project At Sunfish Lake <br /> Blvd. N.W. and T.It. No. 10; Improvement Project #88-27: <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka presented the feasibility study for proposed Improvement Project #88-27 to <br />extend storm sewer across T.H. No. 10 at Sunfish Lake Blvd. The project is Mn/DOT <br />Cooperative A~eement funded. Estimated project cost is $t 12,400; Mn/DOT participation <br />would be $17,100; $95,350 would be levied to the Mississipi River Storm Sewer Taxing <br />District. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Peterson and seconded by Councilmember DeLuca to adopt <br />Resolution #8%02-29 receiving the feasibility repor~ and calling for a public hearing on <br />March 14, 1989 at 7:30 p.m. for Storm Sewer Improvement Project #88-27 (T.H. No. 10 <br />and Sunfish Lake Blvd.). <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Reim~n, Councilmembers DeLuca, Pearson, Cich <br />and Peterson. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #14: <br /> <br />River's Bend Park South Development; Improvement Project <br />#89-1: <br /> <br />5~r. Otto stated that Cit'), Staff is recommending tabling approval of plans and specs for the <br />River's Bend Park south development because of problem areas that have come about. <br />One problem area is the impact of Ct.',,. Rd. #116 on an access to the south portion of the <br />park; this issue is being worked on with the Count), and DNvP-,. Another problem area that <br />m,'ose is because of use of LAWCON ~ant money for development of the north portion of <br />the park, the Dep~tmenr of Trade and Commerce feels they have coordinating fights over <br />an), activity in the entire park area and are objecting to the bridge alignment because of it's <br />impact on the park. <br /> <br />City Council/February 14, 1989 <br /> Page 11 of 14 <br /> <br /> <br />