My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
06/14/89
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Economic Development Commission
>
Agendas
>
1989
>
06/14/89
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2025 12:20:42 PM
Creation date
11/20/2003 10:58:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Economic Development Commission
Document Date
06/14/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mrs. Tripp asked why they were allowed ~o petition again instead of having to wait for a period of <br />on~ yeaT. <br /> <br />City Administrator David Hartley explained that this improvement project was petitioned by fl~e <br />public and not by the CID', which could have been interpreted as unlawful. The lRamsey City <br />Council may accept and process, petitions by the public. <br /> <br />Mrs. Tripp stated that she felt that it can't be considered for one year because of the way it is stated <br />in the City Charter (Chapter 8). <br /> <br />David Hartle3' stated that there is a level of uncertainty as the City Charter still continues to be <br />interpreted, and that we would seriously look at questions from the citizens. <br /> <br />Bernard Wurm - 15354 Hematite Street Northwest - Mr. Wurm asked if it would be less expensive <br />per benefitting property, (as w/th a larger project) to spread out the costs ox, et a larger nunmer of <br />lots. <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka told Mr. Wurm that it is, prop(:rtionally less per lot for a larger project. <br /> <br />Mayor GaD' Reimann explained that the City of Ramsey encourages the grouping of projects such <br />as this to economize. <br /> <br />Mrs. ". ~ipp asked why people in the area could not wait for the proposed 153rd Avenue Project to go <br />through and spread out the cost. <br /> <br />Mayor Reimann asked Public Works Supervisor Merle Mevissen how much maintenance that <br />area of Hematite Street requires. <br /> <br />Mr. Mexdssen replied that they had to bring in Class 5 gravel every year in addition to the normal <br />maintenance practices. <br /> <br />Mr. Gobernatz stated that he was told by his attorneys that to proceed with this project would be <br />illegal before the one year waiting period was completed and that if the process was be~man, he <br />would initiate a lawsuit. <br /> <br />Dax4d Hartley explained the purpose of a public hearing and also that Council could not take action <br />for at least 60 days. <br /> <br />AD JOLrRN%IENT <br /> <br />Moz]on by Councilmember Pearson and seconded by Councilmember DeLuca to adjourn the <br />hearing. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor !Reimann, Councilmembers Pearson, DeLuca, and Peterson. <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Councilmember Cich. <br /> <br />The public hearing adjourned at 7:45 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br />Colleen /~ybak <br />SecretaD' <br /> <br />David Harfley <br />City Administrator <br /> <br />City Council Public i tearing / May 2, 1989 <br /> Page #2 of 2 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.