Laserfiche WebLink
Case #10: <br /> <br />Request For Sile Plan Approval Of Danny's Aluminum Proce,'.:ing; <br />Case Of Mr. i)an Karst: <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Cich and seconded by Councilmember Pearson to approve thc site plan <br />for Danny's Aluminum Processing based on the recommendation of City Staff. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes' Mayor Reimann, Councilmembers DeLuca, Poarson. Peterson and <br />Cich. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Mr. Dan Karst requesmd that thc Chv consider installing a stop sign al 141 st and Basalt Street. <br /> <br />Motion by Counciimcmber DcLuc:~. and seconded by Counciimember Pemrson to direct the Police <br />Department to address Mr. Dan I-(arst's request for a stop sign at ]41st and Basalt Street. <br /> <br />:,~o~Rm carnea. Voting Tee: Mayor Reimann, Counciin]em[mrs DcLuca. }~cterson, Pearson and <br />Cich. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #11: Status Of improvements In Oakwood Hills Addition: <br /> <br />Mr. Raatit~ca reported tha,: to date, Mr. Schuite has paved both the streets in Oakwood Hills <br />Addition: the improvements remaining to be completed are ditch ~addng. application of topsoil and <br />seeding. <br /> <br />Mr. Ha-tley stated that City Staff is recommending that seeding be delayed until August 10; <br />ex/sting letters of credit should be extended or renewed. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Peterson and seconded by Councilmember DeLuca to reduce the <br />performance letter of credit for Oakwood Hills to $10,000 until all improvements have been <br />completed and accepted by the Ci9' En~neer and to extend the maintenance letter of credit through <br />and including Septem~r 15, 1990. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Reimann, Councilmembers DeLuca, Pearson. Peterson and <br />Cich. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case 8,12: Report On Ute Street N.W.: <br /> <br />1~. Raati 'kka reported that per Council direction, he has performed a preliminary study regarding <br />improvements to Ute Street N.W. Mr. Raatikka stated that an additional 20 feet of right-of-way <br />would be required to bring the right-of-way width up to 50 feet; constructing a street with a 66 foot <br />right-of-way width would require the removal of many mature trees, which would add geatly to <br />the cost of construction. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Pearson and seconded by Councilmember DeLuca to schedule an <br /> <br />City Council/July 25, 1989 <br />Page 12 of 15 <br /> <br /> <br />