Laserfiche WebLink
Enterprise Park to Crooked Lake 115 kV Transmission Line March 2012 <br />Environmental Assessment <br />• Epidemiological studies have serious limitations in their ability to demonstrate a <br />cause and effect relationship whereas laboratory studies, by design, can clearly <br />show that cause and effect are possible. Virtually all of the laboratory evidence in <br />animals and humans and most of the mechanistic work done in cells fail to <br />support a causal relationship between exposure to ELF-EMF at environmental <br />levels and changes in biological function or disease status. The lack of consistent <br />positive findings in animal or mechanistic studies weakens the belief that this <br />association is actually due to ELF-EMFs, but it cannot completely discount the <br />epidemiological findings. <br />• The NIEHS concludes that ELF-EMF exposure cannot be recognized as entirely <br />safe because of weak scientific evidence that exposure may pose a leukemia <br />hazard. In our opinion, this finding is insufficient to warrant aggressive <br />regulatory concern. However, because virtually everyone in the United States <br />uses electricity and therefore is routinely exposed to ELF-EMF, passive <br />regulatory action is warranted such as a continued emphasis on educating both <br />the public and the regulated community on means aimed at reducing exposures. <br />The NIEHS does not believe that other cancers or non -cancer health outcomes <br />provide sufficient evidence of a risk to currently warrant concern (NIEHS, 1999). <br />The USEPA states the following viewpoint of the associated health effects of EMFs on <br />its website: <br />Much of the research about power lines and potential health effects is inconclusive. <br />Despite more than two decades of research to determine whether elevated EMF <br />exposure, principally due to magnetic fields, is related to an increased risk of <br />childhood leukemia, there is still no definitive answer. The general scientific <br />consensus is that, thus far, the evidence available is weak and is not sufficient to <br />establish a definitive cause -effect relationship (USEPA: Electric and Magnetic Fields <br />(EMF) Radiation from Power Lines, 2010). <br />The WHO states the following viewpoint of the associate health effects of EMFs on its <br />website: <br />Based on a recent in-depth review of the scientific literature, the WHO concluded <br />that current evidence does not confirm the existence of any health consequences from <br />exposure to low level electromagnetic fields. However, some gaps in knowledge <br />about biological effects exist and need further research (WHO, 2010). <br />In September of 2002, the MSIWG on EMF Issues, published "A White Paper on Electric <br />and Magnetic Field (EMF) Policy and Mitigation Options," referred to as the "White <br />Paper." The MSIWG was formed to examine the potential health impacts of EMFs and <br />to provide useful, science -based information to policy makers in Minnesota. Work <br />Group members included representatives from the Department of Commerce, the <br />Department of Health, the Pollution Control Agency, the Public Utilities Commission, <br />and the Environmental Quality Board (MSIWG, 2002). The White Paper concluded the <br />following findings: <br />35 <br />