Laserfiche WebLink
Enterprise Park to Crooked Lake 115 kV Transmission Line March 2012 <br />Environmental Assessment <br />7. Route Comparison <br />There are two routing scenarios presented in the scope of this environmental assessment, <br />previously described as the Applicant's proposed route, and the Applicant's proposed <br />route incorporating Route Segment Alternative A. These routes are described in Chapter <br />3 of this EA, and on all Figures contained in this document. <br />In analyzing the two routing scenarios, many of the potential impacts would be the same <br />or similar. For example, there are no cultural resources located in the area between 6th <br />Avenue and Garfield Avenue, no matter if the proposed route or segment alternative is <br />followed. However, there are differences in potential impacts with residences located <br />near the line, cost, transportation, and land use. <br />Route Segment Alternative A follows a route that would reduce the number of homes <br />within 36 to 135 feet of the line. The proposed route has 20 more homes within this <br />distance of the transmission line than does the segment alternative. Neither route <br />alternative would cause displacement of residences as a result of constructing and <br />operating the Project. <br />Route Segment Alternative A would be 0.3 miles longer than the Applicant's proposed <br />route. This would result in an increase to project costs of $450,000, or a 3.8 percent <br />increase. <br />Route Segment Alternative A would parallel a portion of the railroad ROW where <br />insufficient ROW may exist for the placement of a transmission line. The BNSF railroad <br />ROW in the project area is 125 feet in width. The communities within the Project area <br />have developed around this railroad alignment, leaving minimal space between the <br />railroad ROW and local businesses, industrial buildings, and communications towers. <br />The Applicant's proposed route, instead of paralleling the railroad ROW in this area, <br />makes a perpendicular crossing at 6th Avenue. <br />Both the Applicant's preferred route and Route Segment Alternative A follow <br />transportation ROW and property lines. Route Segment Alternative A crosses or parallels <br />land owned by the city of Anoka and Anoka County. These lands have development <br />occurring or planned. Volunteers of America has begun construction of a senior <br />continuum of care campus on the property located east of 4th Avenue and north of Grant <br />Street. There is a monopole cell tower located in the city's Public Services equipment <br />yard that is close to the BNSF right-of-way and would likely be impacted by the <br />proposed route segment alternative. Route Segment Alternative A may also impact the <br />rail station which abuts both sides of the tracks. If the segment alternative were to be <br />located on the south side of the tracks, it would impact the planned construction of a <br />multi -level parking facility and pedestrian overpass as well as other commercial <br />development. Locating the line along the north side of the tracks would impact the <br />buildings at 2804 5th Avenue and 2707 6th Avenue which abut the BNSF right-of-way. It <br />is likely that an easement would be required from BNSF to locate the line within this area <br />or the line would have to be constructed over the building(s). The area along the north <br />62 <br />