My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/28/1989
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1989
>
Agenda - Council - 02/28/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2025 4:14:54 PM
Creation date
11/21/2003 10:44:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/28/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
wilt should be isolated by root graft disruption as <br />previously sta~ed. Diseased material originating from such <br />trees will rarely ever support spore fo.-marion, and salvaged <br />material %herefore will not require special treatment to <br />prevent overland spread. Standing trees of. thi~ group <br />showing early s}~ptoms of oak wilt may be s~ved by removing <br />affected branches. The City tree inspector will advise <br />accordingly. <br /> <br />110.29 ROOT GRAFT DISRUPT/ON (BA3%RIERS) AT PROPERTY BOUNDARIES. <br /> <br /> a. If the tree inspector finds that Dutch elm disease or <br />oak wilt threatens to cross property boundaries- or disease <br />control area boundaries, the tree inspector may re.~uire root <br />graft disruption to prevent the spread of disease in this manner. <br />If plowing or trenching is not possible due to terrain, location, <br />or buried utilities, the tree inspector may re~aire chemical <br />root graft disruption. These barriers will be placed in <br />accordance with current technology and plans as may be designated <br />by the Commissioner of Agriculture, State cf Einnesota. <br /> <br /> b. The chzrce, or any portion thereo~ ~ - <br /> . . ~, ~o~ any necessary <br />root barriers nay be assessed against the property on which the <br />root barriers are placed. <br /> <br /> c. Because oak ~i!t is a con, unity problem and because oak <br />wilt control may benefit an entire neighborhoo~, the tree <br />inspector shall recommend and e~courage neighborhood <br />participation and cooperation, inc!u~ing cost sharing, in root <br />graft disruption and other contrc! efforts, especially where oak <br />~i!t is in danger of spreading across property boundaries. <br /> <br />110.210 .~F3~SPORTiNG E~K AA'D 0~ ~OOD PROHibiTED. <br /> <br />any bar)[ intact elm wood, cr wood from the red o~k group that is <br />deue--r..ined to be hazardous, ~ithouu herin= o~taine~ a pe_-~.it from <br />t%~ City tree inspector. ~ City tree inspector ~ crant <br />such pe_-~.its only when such pe_~ission does nc= interfere ~ith <br />the urovisions ~ ~is ordinance. <br /> <br /> Sect!cms !.0109 through !.CTM ~ 3 ~[innescua Code cf Agency <br />E~iuinn) ~ g-~h_r %'!%h <br /> <br />Clerk. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.