Laserfiche WebLink
Management Analyst Brama explained that Patriot Converting is a 24- employee <br />manufacturing/cardboard cutting company located in Anoka currently occupying 24,000 square <br />feet and the company desires to expand to 77,000 square feet with 37 employees: He stated the <br />company has selected the public works campus and this site would require infrastructure <br />improvements and vacation of right -of -way as well as entering into an option agreement with the <br />City. He advised that some engineering work and site surveying has been done and a business <br />subsidy application has been submitted by the company's owners, Brian Stilwell and Mike <br />Stilwell. He noted that the owners were not present at the EDA meeting today. <br />4.02: Economic Development Prospect Foxtrot: Business Subsidy Application <br />Management Analyst Brama provided historical background regarding the City's business <br />subsidy practices and stated the City has guiding policies that must be met in order to provide a <br />business subsidy, including a requirement that the project must meet the "but for" test and the <br />project must be feasible, as well as a requirement that assistance can be no more than $25,000 <br />per qualified job and the business subsidy agreement must establish job and wage goals. He <br />advised the City has been active in economic development and has participated in TIF land <br />write- downs, noting that a large number of businesses in Ramsey were attracted to the City <br />utilizing a TIF write -down. He stated that Patriot Converting is requesting a complete land <br />write -down, valued at $757,000 or $2.00 per square foot. He pointed out that the earlier <br />valuation of $924,000 was a County valuation and staff used the recent Diamond Graphics <br />purchase as a comparable sale; in addition, staff contacted the appraiser who provided the fair <br />market valuation for Diamond Graphics and the appraiser felt this could be used as a comparable <br />sale price. He stated that based on the City's policy, the City has the ability to provide $25,000 <br />times 37 employees or $925,000 as a business subsidy for this project. <br />Mr. Mulrooney advised that Patriot Converting has a buyer interested in purchasing their existing <br />building and the buyer is demanding that they be out of the building by December 31, 2013. He <br />stated that the City's public works site is the only site that can work within their timeframe. He <br />explained there are a number of parcels involved in this expansion and the project would require <br />construction of a cul -de -sac with vacation of the roadway. He noted that some of the offsite <br />project costs would not be financeable costs by a bank lender because utilities are not included in <br />overall project costs from a financing perspective. He distributed information regarding sources <br />and uses of funds and stated the value of the site has been determined to be $758,000. He stated <br />the prospect has estimated the cost to construct a building at $4.2 million and has estimated <br />equipment costs of $600,000. He stated that professional fees, closing costs, contingency and <br />interim interest are estimated at $155,000 bringing the total project cost to $5.7 million, noting <br />this figure does not include the offsite costs of bringing in utilities. He advised the prospect has <br />a history of using SBA 504 financing and plans to use this financing again. He pointed out that <br />this project also anticipates the City's land write -down of $191,469 and explained that staff <br />completed a tax increment analysis and what the project would generate over the life of the tax <br />increment district in present value terms. He stated staff also looked at different types of tax <br />increment districts, including the establishment of a redevelopment district. He explained that a <br />redevelopment district would provide 25 years in increment; however, there are special rules for <br />qualifying the site as a redevelopment district and staff does not believe the site can meet the test <br />of being a redevelopment district because a large portion of the property is currently vacant and <br />does not have buildings on it in need of substantial rehabilitation. He stated staff and the City's <br />Economic Development Authority /June 6, 2013 <br />Page 2 of 7 <br />