Laserfiche WebLink
Member Skaff expressed concern about the financial viability of the company and where they <br />will come up with the $300,000. He suggested the City request this information from the <br />prospect. <br />Member Riley stated the prospect's original proposal was that they had nothing in the project <br />and that was unacceptable to him. He did not think the EDA had enough information at this time <br />to make a recommendation, adding that scenario #1 is the only option he would consider. <br />Member Hardin stated from his cursory review of the financials, he did not feel comfortable with <br />the company's ability to service the debt in either scenario. He added he was open to looking at <br />some kind of City participation but was not in favor of a full land write -down. He asked if the <br />SBA portion could be increased under scenario #2. He also asked if there is equity in the <br />prospect's existing building. <br />Mr. Mulrooney stated the SBA 504 portion is limited to 40% of project costs under any scenario. <br />He stated he did not know the agreed upon purchase price of the prospect's existing building and <br />agreed to find out. He also agreed to find out the prospect's current liability on their building. <br />Member Brunt agreed with the concerns expressed regarding a full land write -down and agreed <br />that further investigation is in order before moving forward with a recommendation. <br />Chairperson Steffen stated it appears the EDA is in agreement that scenario #2 should be taken <br />off the table. He stated he would be okay with $191,000 and the land write -down. He added he <br />was leery of approving this with two sources of City funds. He stated he would like to see the <br />prospect come back with the source of funds for the $315,000 before going to the City Council. <br />It was the consensus of the EDA to state that it was conceptually willing to consider a land write- <br />down of $191,000. It was also the consensus of the EDA that it was not interested in a full land <br />write -down on the property. It was also the consensus of the EDA to state that it was hesitant to <br />provide a RLF for this prospect. It was also the consensus of the EDA that all of these items <br />would require proof of owner equity and more detailed financial information. <br />The EDA discussed the prospect's timeline and whether this item should proceed to the City <br />Council or whether to wait for further information from the prospect. <br />Member LeTourneau suggested it might be appropriate for staff to present the finalized <br />application and responses to the EDA's questions to the EDA Chairperson and if the prospect <br />has provided all the requested information and responded to all the questions, then it can move <br />forward to the City Council as a recommendation from the EDA. <br />Chairperson Steffen stated he was amenable to Member LeTourneau's suggestion. <br />4.03: Selection of the 2013 Ramsey Business of the Year <br />Management Analyst Brama explained the EDA selects a Business of the Year that is presented <br />at the annual business appreciation golf tournament, scheduled this year for Tuesday, August <br />20th. He indicated the 2012 Business of the Year was The Links at Northfork and the 2011 <br />Economic Development Authority /June 6, 2013 <br />Page 5 of 7 <br />