My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 07/18/2013
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Economic Development Authority
>
2013
>
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 07/18/2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 12:24:23 PM
Creation date
7/24/2013 11:39:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Economic Development Authority
Document Date
07/18/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Management Analyst Brama advised the EDA previously indicated it was interested in pursuing <br />a marketing package for this node and the ownership group has expressed an interest in a <br />marketing package. He requested permission from the EDA to obtain proposals for a marketing <br />package to present to the EDA for review. <br />Member LeTourneau noted that the staff report includes information regarding current property <br />owners, maps, and financial assistance options and suggested publicizing this information on the <br />City's website as a form of marketing package instead of going out and paying for something. <br />He added he felt the stakeholders should participate in the distribution and cost of any marketing <br />package. <br />Management Analyst Brama agreed to prepare a revised marketing information package for <br />review by the EDA at its next meeting. He indicated the City has limited capability from a <br />marketing perspective and asked the EDA to consider listing with a broker or someone with a <br />larger reach for investors. He agreed to present the EDA with options regarding marketing at its <br />next meeting. <br />Chairperson Steffen stated he would like to see the owners agree to list the site together with one <br />sign and one broker and requested that staff discuss this with the ownership group. <br />City Administrator Ulrich indicated that a potential compromise that could add value is to clear <br />the site and consolidate the parcels for sale. He stated the EDA could front the money to clear <br />the site if the property owners agreed to list the site with one realtor and sell it as a block. He <br />stated the City could also offer assistance with demolition costs. <br />Member Williams felt that offering any demolition assistance and/or incenting the property <br />owners to work together needs to be part of a bigger plan and felt the property owners and <br />brokers should be leading that effort, adding the EDA's appropriate role is as a facilitator. <br />Management Analyst Brama stated that one DEED program allows a 50% match to a developer <br />or city to demolish buildings to redevelop a parcel and the City could get a grant for eligible <br />costs. He stated another DEED program includes a loan program from the State to purchase and <br />demolish properties. He stated if the City were able to redevelop the north side, half the loan <br />would be forgiven and a benefit of the loan program is that the City would not have to make <br />repayment for two years. He added the grant program would be advertised through the <br />marketing package and the demolition costs for the three buildings could be part of the <br />marketing package. <br />Member Brunt stated it was his impression that the EDA agreed that a housing development in <br />this area would lead to a better performing commercial node that included both the north and <br />south side. He expressed concern that the Rum River Hills proposal is for the south side only <br />and felt that any development proposal has to include both the north and south sides. He asked if <br />the Rum River Hills representatives understand that the EDA wants a development proposal for <br />the entire site. <br />Chairperson Steffen stated the Rum River Hills representatives know something has to happen <br />on the north side, adding he did not think it has to be one developer for the whole site. He stated <br />Economic Development Authority/July 11, 2013 <br />Page 5 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.