My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 08/08/2013
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Economic Development Authority
>
2013
>
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 08/08/2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 12:24:37 PM
Creation date
8/26/2013 11:11:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Economic Development Authority
Document Date
08/08/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chairperson Steffen stated it would be ideal to have the site marketed by a single broker instead <br />of three separate brokers. He asked if the City has done RFQs to hire a broker in the past and <br />questioned whether the City should prepare an RFQ on land not owned by the City. <br />Member Riley stated the three property owners have to make the decision and the City would <br />only be the facilitator and suggested that staff meet with the property owners to tell them the City <br />would like to help them work together to market the property. He stated the City should then <br />step back and not engage in an RFQ process. <br />Member Williams asked if this issue been brought up with the property owners in the past. <br />Assistant to the City Administrator Brama replied the idea of a unified marketing plan was <br />brought up at a previous meeting and there was conceptual buy -in from the property owners. <br />Member Williams stated it was likely there would be issues, particularly with the bank, in having <br />an exclusive listing agreement with one broker. <br />Chairperson Steffen requested that staff inform the ownership group about what the City would <br />like to pursue for marketing the property and to let them know Mr. Fisher was consulted about <br />the best ways to market the site. <br />Member LeTourneau asked if Mr. Fisher talked about ways to make the property more attractive <br />for purchase, e.g., demolishing the buildings, and suggested that this idea be introduced to the <br />property owners. <br />Mr. Brama confirmed that staff will not conduct an RFQ and will meet with the ownership group <br />to talk about selecting a lead broker and to discuss issues that may arise from exclusive listing <br />agreements. He stated staff would also ask the ownership group if they are interested in pursuing <br />demolition of the buildings before listing the property for sale. <br />City Financial Tools <br />Chairperson Steffen expressed support for the statement that the EDA will not consider City <br />financial assistance for proposals that do not directly address existing blighted properties. <br />Member LeTourneau stated that County HRA dollars might be a resource available for removal <br />of blighted properties. <br />It was consensus of the EDA to add paragraph (v) under City Financial Tools stating "County <br />HRA dollars." <br />Mr. Brama stated the State Redevelopment Grant and Loan Program refers to two separate <br />programs and explained that if the City used the loan program the City has to be the property <br />owner; as a result, this loan program should be stricken from the list of financial tools available. <br />He stated the State Redevelopment Grant program is available and the City can apply for this <br />grant on behalf of a property owner. He added that funds under this grant program are only <br />available to projects that are ready to begin construction within the next twelve months. <br />Economic Development Authority/July 18, 2013 <br />Page 5 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.