My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/27/2013
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2013
>
Agenda - Council - 08/27/2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 9:37:15 AM
Creation date
9/17/2013 8:57:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/27/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
176
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CC Regular Session <br />Meeting Date: 08/27/2013 <br />By: Chris Anderson, Community <br />Development <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Approve the Emerald Ash Borer Management Plan <br />4. 5. <br />Background: <br />Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) is an exotic, invasive insect from Asia that was discovered in St. Paul (Ramsey County) <br />in 2009. Since the initial detection of EAB in St. Paul, it has also been confirmed in Minneapolis (Hennepin <br />County), Houston and Winona Counties, Shoreview (Ramsey County) and most recently in Roseville (Ramsey <br />County). EAB poses a serious threat to Minnesota's forests and urban forests as there are over 900 million ash trees <br />within the state. As this pest spreads, it will undoubtedly have significant economic and environmental impacts. <br />While EAB has not yet been found in Anoka County, it is a matter of 'when' rather than 'if and once it is <br />discovered, it will likely change the landscape of the community as well as have an impact on the budget. Thus, <br />City Staff worked with the Environmental Policy Board to develop a draft management plan outlining steps that the <br />City would take to manage the inevitable discovery of this pest. It is important to note that the draft EAB <br />Management Plan is not intended to prevent or eliminate EAB, which has proven impractical based on results in <br />other states, but rather to spread the potential cost of management over multiple budget cycles. <br />Notification: <br />Observations: <br />The EAB Management Plan is broken into multiple sections: Purpose, Applicability, Administration, Introduction <br />and Ash Management Plan. While the plan would apply to both public and private lands, based on <br />recommendations from the EPB, it was modified such that required actions (such as removals due to infestation of <br />EAB) would only be applicable to public trees. The required actions would not apply to privately held lands, but <br />would focus on simple educational efforts. However, it should be noted that the state (MN Department of <br />Agriculture) may become involved and could mandate removal and disposal to slow further spread. <br />The most meaningful part of the draft plan is the Ash Management Plan. In essence, this section discusses how the <br />City will address ash trees in general on public lands. Some of the actions have already been implemented, such as <br />prohibiting the planting of ash trees on public property (boulevards and parks) and education/public awareness <br />through the website, newsletter and QCTV. <br />A key aspect of the Ash Management Plan is completing a tree inventory. Presently, we do not have any data <br />regarding the number of ash trees (on public lands) in the City or what percentage of the community forest is <br />comprised of ash trees. Thus, it is unknown just how much of an impact this pest will have both on the budget and <br />landscape. An inventory would also be beneficial for scheduling and tracking maintenance, ensuring a diverse mix <br />of species is planted and identifying planting opportunities. The plan does not specify a start date, nor end date for <br />this inventory, but does recommend that the City start to consider this inventory to be staged over a series of <br />managable timeframes as time and resources allow. The specific implementation of this portion would be <br />considered as part of normal budget review cycles. In addition, the City could seek additional grant funding for <br />such activity if necessary. <br />The draft management plan also contemplates whether chemical treatments are warranted. Ramsey's street tree <br />population is still fairly young and thus, the trees are not at a mature size. Therefore, the draft plan states that the <br />City will not utilize chemical treatments except for 'Legacy' trees, which includes trees that have historical meaning <br />or those rated as being in excellent condition (through an inventory). Essentially, with the young age of the street <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.