Laserfiche WebLink
geothermal pumps. Updating the code to allow <br />geothermal pumps may be easiest. The type of <br />system permitted in the community should be <br />specified (i.e., open or closed loop); location <br />and setback requirements for above -ground. <br />and below -ground components should be iden- <br />tified. Screening requirements should also be <br />established. For a more in-depth discussion of <br />issues related to regulating geothermal pumps, <br />see the May zoio issue of Zoning Practice. <br />The adoption of wind and solar power <br />regulations draws more attention in some com- <br />munities when neighboring property owners <br />worry that wind turbines and solar arrays will <br />have an impact on their properties. There are <br />multiple sources of model wind and solar regu- <br />lations available to local planners, and the big <br />issues to consider for a zoning update include: <br />(1) changing maximum height limits both to al- <br />low solar panels on rooftops and to permit wind <br />turbines obstacle -free access to the wind, (2) <br />determining whether wind turbine(s) and solar <br />panels or arrays are a primary or accessory use <br />and whether permitting will be required, and (3) <br />addressing the use of wind and solar systems <br />in conjunction with nonconforming uses. For <br />additional information about regulating wind <br />and solar energy systems, see the July 2o08 and <br />November zolo issues of Zoning Practice. <br />Building Code versus Zoning Code <br />Another approach to incorporating energy <br />conservation and renewable energy production <br />into the zoning code is to require the construc- <br />tion of solar -ready homes that can be fitted <br />with solar energy generation technology. From <br />a structural perspective, communities can also <br />consider the use of individual building compo- <br />nents such as green or cool roofs, shade struc- <br />tures, building insulation and green walls, or a <br />green building rating system such as LEED or <br />Energy Star. When adding these requirements <br />to the zoning code, communities should also <br />examine the potential overlap with existing <br />or proposed building code standards to avoid <br />conflicting regulations and confusion. <br />STORMWATER MANAGEMENT <br />In many communities, stormwater management <br />and treatment is overseen by the public works <br />department and is not considered a zoning issue <br />except to the extent that stormwater manage- <br />ment infrastructure is shown on final site plans <br />for approval. This approach stems from the <br />National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System <br />permitting framework, established as part of the <br />1972 Clean Water Act, which identified polluted <br />stormwater as an engineering "problem" best <br />addressed by removing it from a site through <br />a system of sewers and pipes, typically called <br />gray infrastructure, that drained the stormwater <br />to a detention basin or a wastewater treatment <br />plant. As this approach has evolved, both public <br />works and planning officials have moved to a <br />site design model that incorporates green or wet <br />infrastructure. The goal is to provide partial or <br />complete on -site stormwater mitigation that both <br />reduces stormwater runoff and improves the wa- <br />ter's quality, while limiting the size, scope, and <br />public investment in stormwater infrastructure. <br />Incorporating stormwater management into site <br />design also provides quality -of -life benefits such <br />as public spaces and the enhanced aesthetic <br />value of improved landscaping (EPA zoo7). <br />Low Impact and Green Infrastructure <br />Development Standards <br />The most inclusive approach to establishing on - <br />site stormwater treatment standards is the adop- <br />tion of low -impact development (LID) and green <br />infrastructure standards. Putting these standards <br />in place and moving to a less engineered storm - <br />water management approach may require a new <br />level of coordination between the local planning <br />and public works departments. A recent trend <br />in addressing this issue is to update the zoning <br />code to incorporate a specific standard for on - <br />site stormwater management, such as "no net <br />increase in stormwater runoff volume, rate, or <br />pollutant loads from new construction and rede- <br />velopment that adds more than x amount of im- <br />pervious surfaces," and to provide a description <br />of preferred low -impact and green approaches <br />that can be used in the community. Communities <br />then adopt engineering standards and specifica- <br />This map, created <br />by the National <br />Renewable Energy <br />Laboratory for the U.S. <br />Department of Energy, <br />shows the average <br />daily solar resources <br />available across the United <br />States. <br />tions for the individual techniques and required <br />maintenance as part of the overall local engineer- <br />ing design and review requirements. Given that <br />the sample standard above is fairly strict, it's <br />important to note that each community will need <br />to determine to what degree it wants to, and is <br />capable of, addressing stormwater on -site. For a <br />more in-depth discussion of how to promote LID <br />and green infrastructure through development <br />regulations, see the September 2012 and zoio <br />issues of Zoning Practice. <br />Parking and Landscaping Standards <br />When considering zoning updates for storm - <br />water management, two key related issues for <br />communities to tackle are reducing and rede- <br />signing surface parking. This can be done either <br />through specific updates to off-street parking <br />provisions or as part of the overall adoption of <br />LID and green infrastructure development stan- <br />dards. Anecdotally, we know that many parking <br />standards are based on outdated studies, were <br />copied from neighboring communities or older <br />model regulations, or have just been carried <br />forward as long as anybody can remember. This <br />has resulted in the over construction of parking <br />spaces in oversized parking lots. Specific up- <br />dates should include (1) reductions to required <br />parking ratios, (2) the establishment of a park- <br />ing maximum (e.g., no more than 110 percent <br />of the minimum requirement), (3) standards for <br />shared parking and including available on -street <br />parking in the total parking count, (4) incen- <br />tives and requirements to reduce or eliminate <br />impervious surfaces in parking lots, and (5) <br />updated parking lot/landscaping requirements <br />to incorporate green infrastructure that allows <br />stormwater to infiltrate the soil rather than sheet <br />flow across the parking lot. A number of cities, <br />ZONINGPRACTICE 7.13 <br />AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION I page 5 <br />