Laserfiche WebLink
September 10, 2013 <br />The Honorable John C. Hoffman <br />Chief Judge Tenth Judicial District <br />Washington County Government Center <br />14949 — 62n Street North <br />Stillwater, MN 55082 -3802 <br />Re: City of Ramsey, Anoka County, Minnesota, Charter Commission Annual Report <br />Dear Judge Hoffman: <br />In accordance with Minnesota Statutes 410.05, the following is an annual report reflecting the <br />activities of the City of Ramsey Charter Commission during the year 2012. <br />Members of the Charter Commission for 2012 were as follows: Susan Anderson, Jim Bendtsen <br />Benjamin Deemer, Joseph Field, John Niederhaus, Harry Niska, Marilyn (Moe) Shea, Cindy <br />Sherman, and Chad Sivertson. Commissioners Shea and Sherman did not request reappointment <br />to the Charter Commission when their terms ended December 31, 2012. <br />The Charter Commission met on March 26, 2102. Commissioner Field was elected as Chair and <br />Commissioner Sherman was elected as Vice Chair for the year 2012. It was noted there were two <br />new members - John Niederhaus and Chad Sivertson. Both replaced resigning members and are <br />filling a term to expire December 31, 2013. Discussion was held on Chapter 8 of the Charter <br />regarding Special Assessment Petitions. It was noted that currently 35 percent of benefitted <br />property owners can petition for a public improvement, then requiring a simple City Council <br />majority vote to order the improvement, or without a petition, or less than 35 percent of the <br />benefitted property owners petition, the City Council, can, with a four - fifths vote, order the public <br />improvement. The recommendation to the Charter Commission was to consider changing the 35 <br />percent petition numbers to the higher threshold of 50 percent. The reasoning behind the <br />recommendation was to have a higher bar to get a project going before all the commitments and <br />all City resources go forward. This would be more efficient and still meet the intent that the project <br />could be stopped. The City would like to be more efficient — including cost efficient on the front <br />end. The Charter Commission directed the City Attorney to draft an ordinance — changing the <br />petition amount from 35 percent to 50 percent and bringing it back for Charter review. The Charter <br />also reviewed the publication requirements for the City's newsletter. After a fairly lengthy <br />discussion, the Commission voted to postpone this subject. The Commission approved the <br />Summary Letter to the Judge for year 2011. <br />