Laserfiche WebLink
4. EDA BUSINESS <br />4.01: Statement of Goals: 167th Avenue and Highway 47 Node <br />Assistant to the City Administrator Brama presented a draft Statement of Goals for the 167/47 <br />node and stated the purpose of the Statement of Goals is intended to guide City participation in <br />the redevelopment of the 167/47 node and identify a common goal, common vision, and working <br />parameters. He pointed out that all final decisions related to this node are subject to City Council <br />approval. He stated the Goal is to improve and/or remove blighted properties and encourage <br />sustainable market - driven redevelopment of the 167/47 node that will benefit the entire City. He <br />presented a map of the 167/47 node delineating the primary and secondary areas of concern and <br />requested input regarding the wording of the Goal, explaining that if the goal of City <br />involvement is to remove blighted properties, the Goal specifically states that these blighted <br />properties need to be addressed with the redevelopment of this node. He recited the Vision <br />statement in the draft Statement of Goals and noted the document references market driven <br />development with a mixture of residential and retail uses. He advised the Parameters state the <br />City does not support purchasing property to redevelop the 167/47 node and the City supports <br />facilitating an ownership group meeting to achieve a consistent, collaborative approach with a <br />single voice among all property owners. He stated the EDA previously expressed an interest in <br />the idea of sponsoring a professional marketing package with the idea that the EDA will manage <br />and facilitate any marketing efforts at a high level. He advised that professional marketing <br />material could be developed in partnership with the City and marketed by a third party broker or, <br />alternatively, professional marketing material could be developed and marketed internally by the <br />City. He stated the Parameters also state that the City would support a Comprehensive Plan and <br />Zoning Amendment to allow retail or residential land uses and the City does not support a <br />Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendment to allow warehouse or light manufacturing land <br />uses. He stated the Parameters include a list of financial tools available and requested input <br />regarding the statement that the EDA will not consider City financial assistance for proposals <br />that do not address the existing blighted properties in this node. He advised that the Parameters <br />also state the City would be willing to consider utilizing Sewer Fund dollars to construct a trunk <br />sewer line to serve this node, adding that without the trunk sewer line it would be challenging to <br />get interest from developers to invest in this area. <br />Member Skaff questioned whether a church might be an appropriate use for this property. <br />Member LeTourneau stated the City might not want to actively pursue a church in this particular <br />area if the goal is to improve the City's tax base. <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated the goals do not specifically address the City's tax base and the <br />City will have to decide whether the main discussion is about building the tax base or cleaning <br />up this node as well as whether to allow any tax exempt use in this area, e.g., a church or school. <br />Mr. Brama pointed out that a lot of the economic development tools available ask specific <br />questions about tax base and jobs creation so it would be challenging to use those economic <br />development tools if the property was tax exempt. <br />Economic Development Authority /July 18, 2013 <br />Page 2 of 7 <br />