Agenda - Council - 08/22/1989 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

recommend City Council approval of Mr. david Eauar,'£ recuest for a con~2;.tiona! u.se p~,,it to constru;~ and operate ~zrther, that ~he oonditiona! use pe~,gt be ~me.nSed aa "+~. %3 - C.qmn~e to read: after site plan r~,-iew.' 'That no development '~ .... ~,~ take ~lace until Item f4 Chanoe to read: 'That the - _ co.,~_on~a use perK;it is contingent upon tbs applicant entering into a mutual]}' agreeable develo~nent agreament. ' Further Discussion: Mz. Norris inuuired as to "'~mn~ e~-~==;~'s~ ...... ~,~,, direct,o,,; ~ regarding a time frame for construction of the advertising sign. Commission consensus was that the advertisin9 sign shall be addresses as part of the site Dian. F~otion carried. Voting Yes: Terr]', Hendriksen ~nd La~ae. Holm and Howell. Qnainnan Zinrnerman, Co~,issioners Sh~mway, Voting No: None. ;.bsent: Commissioners ~ R_~=~uest yo~ ~re34m~na~v Pla% ~pprova2 o~ Jun{o~ Woodsy- Case Qf Mr. Dick }tnutson: ~nairman Zimmerman stated nhat ~lbin Peterson has e>~ressed concern for the maintenance of a previous ag. reement with the City stating that the e;~ension of sewer and water is intended to se~e his property and River's Bend. City 5ngineer Raatikka ~ated tinat tinere was mn ar_eam_n~ dra~m up in !984 when River's Bend was platted. The ~-~-v A~o_n_x. has reviewed "'~-~ a_~rea~ent and it states ~at the se~-ices are intend'ed to serve, but not sole]_y, the 32.bin .r-~terson property. ~tion by Co,~r£ssioner Hendriksen and seconded by Con~mission'er Shumway to .... Loo~ until such time as the t~le Dr~a~~ plat aDDr~¢~ of Junior ,~ ~= I,~tro ~ci! h~ made ao_'="~e.,.,~,~.~ =-~.o., ~ resarding_ the ex--~nsion_ of P~msey' s Urban DJea ~nd a dete~,~,aticn h~ ~en made r.==.a_n~=--~{4 c =~_=~,.-~n~-~ cf additio~ sewer ~city, ~ it is grant~. Further Discu~_=o,.:,==~' ~ !,is. Norris stated that a decision has been made re~arding which ~rceis would receive the additional sewer capacit_v; ~ev's Dro~ to ~tro ~'~ncil s~cifi~ ~ne a._~ ~ __. Dy the addition~ ~cztv' ca~.' ' ~m~==~oner Hendriksen inquired, as tc who ~;es the decision re~ardinc which ~rc=~ = w~! ~ ~lo~ted ~e additio~ . re~e~ ~n=~ Pia~,in~ and Zoning and City Co~nci! a_c_.lon ~sed on St~f r~o~ndatiop~. ~z~;Jssioner stated ~' ~ ~n=~ ~t was his understana;n~ that the ~,~.~ic hear; .... ~n~ on the pro~sed ~endam~t to the 3 ooo ~-~ Ar .-~' _.~ U~=~. ea was forc=~nering ;hour and several areas were listed as ~tenti~ reclpien;s cf the additicnai _ _ . Pe=_~d.a stated that ~! of ~ne are~ listed in the oubl~c hearlno are Lntended to ~nefit by ~ne addition~ ~c~tv recelvec. ~_. Paazikka e)~ia~ ~nat ~nese are~ have r~u==+=d s~er ~nd water service a~no.~e~ tD[in9 necessary ac:ion, including Plm~ning & Zoning Co.~m~ssion/~zil B, Oas~ 7 of 9