Laserfiche WebLink
MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />RE: <br />P.I.N.: <br /> <br />Mark Banwart, Community Development Director <br /> <br />Bruce Bacon, Environmental Specialist <br /> <br />October 20, 1989 <br /> <br />Steve Gorecki, 14140 Azurite St. N.W., Ramsey <br />27-32-25-44-0002 <br /> <br />Mr. Gorecki requested a site visit to ascertain whether or not stored diseased haz,'u'dous wood is <br />present on his lot. Mr. Gorecki has a "Grounds Maintenance Service", including tree work, <br />(clearing, planting and maintenance). In the current woodpile, for firewood and saw logs, Mr. <br />Gorec 'ld estimates 50 cords of material sits on the lot now. Very little bark is intact on the elm <br />wood is currently visible. Several species of saw logs and fkewood are stored here, some split, <br />some ready to split, and some saw logs. There is no brush currently stored here. I did not see <br />much red oak with tight bark on it. A few red oak limb pieces had wilt spore mats visible. <br />Cottonwood, walnut, the little debarked elm, and white/burr oak were present. <br /> <br />Regarding disease hazard, we should note that elm and oak are dormant as far as spreading to new <br />infections from late summer until spring. The pieces of red oak in a pile that have old oak wilt <br />spore mats need to be removed (or edges covered and sealed) by April 1st. There are some red oak <br />pieces with bark intact in a pile, and their hazard cannot be assessed without completing piece by <br />piece assessment. Mr Gorec 'ki would not estimate what the origin or disease infection of the wood <br />is, but wants to comply with his on-site practices. <br /> <br />Mr. Gorecki notes that he is familiar with disease control practices, that his business is in a disease <br />control zone, and that he is intent on complying on a year-round basis with the ordinance, now that <br />there is one. Technically, because of the season, Mr. Gorec 'ki is in compliance. <br /> <br />A spring-time inspection of woodpiles needs to be made to determine compliance at that time. IX'n-. <br />Gorecki has no problem if the City wants to make at least annual (or periodic) inspection of <br />residential and business piled wood, including his. <br /> <br />Clearly, the frequency of inspection would need to be often to ascertain the presence or transfer of <br />diseased wood through any such site unless there is voluntary and 'knowledgeable application of <br />such rules of sorting wood by origin. It is at a point of origin that t'e disease hazard is best <br />assessed; that is, oak and elm are more easily diagnosed in their uncut context. From now until <br />April 1, 1990, there is no particular disease hazard. <br /> <br />My recommendation is that further technical information needs to be gathered and applied as to <br />spread by resale of such wood as to disease hazard. M.r. Gorecld has a Certified Tree Inspector on <br />his staff at this time, so that continuing evaluation of the disease hazard could be monitored by his <br />staff person in between City inspections, if so directed. <br /> <br />Basically, because of the potential spread of oak, elm (other Fee) diseases through resale of <br />firewood, NO diseased elm or oak wood should transfer through this business in the disease <br />control zone. <br /> <br />BFB:ccr <br /> <br /> <br />