My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/28/1989
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1989
>
Agenda - Council - 11/28/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2025 11:48:01 AM
Creation date
11/26/2003 2:05:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/28/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
},'lark Banv,'art replied that thc utility laterals are paid for by thc developer; if it is <br />economically feasible, it has been thc City's policy to extend trunk hnes as a tax increment <br />financing project: if the economics a~ not there, it cannot be financed as a tax increment <br />project; if it can't be financed with tax increment financing, it is safe to sa)' it is not feasible <br />for the developer to underwrite the cost. Any properties adjacent to sewer and water lines <br />will be required to hook-up to the sen'ices within 2 years. <br /> <br />Janet Bernstrom - Stated that when an apartment complex was being considered for the <br />subject property, it was stated at meetings that commercial uses require larger pipe sizing <br />than residential uses, and on that basis nearby residents would be on a deferred status with <br />respect to hooking up to the system. <br /> <br />Mark Banwan stated that when trunk lines are developed, they are sized to facilitate the <br />entire benefitting area. The two year hook-up requirement when sewer becomes available <br />is a factor that is being mandated to the City by Metro Council. Mr. Banwart stated that <br />there are definitions being developed by the City that will specifically define when sewer is <br />considered to be 'available'. <br /> <br />Robert Bernstrom - Inquired if the City has to replace the B-1 and R-JU areas if Fl'eischer's <br />2nd Addition is rezoned to R-1U. <br /> <br />Mark Banwart replied that the City does not have to replace any zones that are rezoned. <br /> <br />Janet Bemsrrom - Stated that the City will be losing commercial tax base if it continues to <br />rezone B- 1 and R-3 without replacing it. <br /> <br />Marilyn Katnis - 14660 St. Francis Blvd. N.W. - Inquired why the area is developing at <br />urban densities and why that City can't remain rural. <br /> <br />Mark Banwart replied that the subject area is within the designated MUSA area which <br />means that Metro Council and the Metro Waste Control Commission has authorized the <br />potential development of urban sewer and water lots in this area. Mark Banwart stated that <br />it takes over 5 square miles of rural development to end up with a value equivalent to 400 <br />acres of urban development; the realiB, is that if the communiry is going to develop as a full- <br />fledged city, high density urban development is more valuable than rural development. <br /> <br />Janet Bemsn-om - Inquired as to when the developer will making a determination regarding <br />whether or not the sewer and water project is economically feasible. <br /> <br />Mark Banwan replied that the developer will make a determination regarding the economic <br />feasibility of the project based on the feasibility study or the tax increment financing <br />process. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner La.Due and seconded by Commissioner Deemer to enter into the <br />public hearing record a letter received from Anna Boe dated September 27, 1989 regarding <br />questions and concerns with the proposed Fieischer's 2nd Addition. <br /> <br />Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearin~October 3, 1989 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.