Laserfiche WebLink
most var~,~!~h~a~ ordinance, appears to se{ forth a re~so~able <br />~~ve-~e co~erne which have been ~tated her~alter~ <br /> <br /> ~.,,_~e.vel~men~hatl ~e conducted so that the <br /> <br /> We are concerned that the siz~ and ~er of <br /> river frontage lot~ not be determined by the n~- <br /> bet of available clearings, because reasonable <br /> valu~ will be achieved only if tots can be pla~ed <br /> in an orderly manner at th~ frontage allowed by <br /> the ordinance. If the number of lots is limited to <br /> the number of available clearings, the number of <br /> potential lots may be substantially reduced result- <br /> ing in substantial money loss to land owners. <br /> <br />~! a minimm of 1-3/4" diameter measured one <br /> <br />foot above the ground .... ~6'-vi'/~b-f'tq=al-tn--n--o <br />c a ~--a~~-en s~t ~ex-c e e~ .-1 o 'treeS-per <br /> <br />~velopment s~_~ ~eSuce ~he emstmg cro~ <br />c rearer ..than .... <br /> <br />We are concerned as to whiCh of these provisions <br /> <br />"in no case need density exceed 10 trees <br />per acre" or <br /> <br /> Z. "Development shall not reduce the existing <br /> crown cover greater than 50.0°/0 . . ." <br /> <br /> are concerned because some of our acreaEe is <br /> <br /> ~re ~lso concerned, tha~ the ordinance shoed <br /> req~re ~he~n~ of any trees which need <br /> be removed because of serious storm <br />disetse or other acts of God. <br /> <br />1983 <br /> <br /> <br />