Laserfiche WebLink
Council Business <br />Mayor Strommen called the regular City Council meeting back to order at 9:38 p.m. <br />Mayor Strommen again thanked all who shared input tonight, noting the Council is also <br />struggling with this issue and appreciated listening to comments made. She explained the <br />ordinances are in draft form and agreed the directives need to be incorporated. Mayor Strommen <br />stated given the amount of input received and the need to have the draft ordinances in better <br />form, she would suggest continuing action to the next meeting so there is more time to wrestle <br />with the issues raised. She suggested the two ordinances in Case 6.1 also be continued for the <br />same reason. Mayor Strommen asked staff to respond to the questions raised by the public. <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated in 2014, additional levy capacity of $931,000 was not exercised. <br />Since the Council established a preliminary levy, at this point, that additional levy capacity <br />cannot be captured for 2014. He stated if living on private roads, there may be a way to <br />accomplish not charging them if the Council establishes such a policy but the thought is that all <br />use public roads. On the question of projects the EDA Manager brought in, that can be <br />researched and presented. City Administrator Ulrich stated if there is an excess of franchise fee <br />funds, the Council can reassess revenues and expenses. If there are excess funds the franchise <br />fee can be lowered and if there is a shortfall, the franchise fee can be increased. He explained <br />that funds not used within a calendar year would be invested and used for future projects. <br />Mayor Strommen stated when looking at five-year needs, Year One may be less and Year Two <br />may be more. Because of this, there may be an excess or shortfall in any given year; however, it <br />is annualized to be equal each year. <br />City Administrator Ulrich indicated that is correct. He stated cities that do not have franchise <br />fees for road repairs typically use a 20-50% special assessment. He suggested the City Attorney <br />address the question raised relating to a Charter amendment to include rates and sunset dates, <br />noting it would have more stature and be more difficult to change than an ordinance. With <br />regard to the tax increment district coming back on line, it was projected to coincide with debt <br />service on the Municipal Center so there would not be a big hit to property taxes. City <br />Administrator Ulrich explained if homes do not have gas or electric service, they would not be <br />charged for the franchise fee. He stated staff discussed whether it was an option to put a fee on <br />the City's sewer, water, street light, or storm sewer bill; however, there is no Statutory right for <br />such a road improvement utility. If someone is on financial support, he does not know whether <br />the fee would be waived by the utility company. <br />Mayor Strommen asked staff to determine whether The Residence at The COR have both gas <br />and electric service, respond to the process to eliminate assessment in the ordinance, and <br />determine if maintenance is conducted whether or not it is required or within the PASER. She <br />also requested clarification on use of future MSA funds, and definitions around street <br />maintenance. <br />City Council / October 8, 2013 <br />Page 17 of 24 <br />