My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/13/2013
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2013
>
Agenda - Council - 08/13/2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 9:36:06 AM
Creation date
10/25/2013 4:02:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/13/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
868
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ramsey, Nowthen, St. Francis, Oak Grove, and Bethel, Minnesota <br />Feasibility Study for Shared or Cooperative Fire and Emergency Services <br />they have very little day to day contact otherwise. Under this level of mutual aid, specific resources are <br />typically requested by the fire department, through the appropriate chain of command, and sometimes <br />coordinated by local or regional emergency management personnel. Depending on the level of the <br />request, the response can sometimes be slow and the authorization process may be cumbersome due <br />to the exchange of official information or even elected official's approval that may be required. <br />Written Mutuof Aid Agreements <br />This form of mutual aid takes the previous form one step further by formalizing written agreements <br />between communities (typically immediate neighbors in a region) in an effort to simplify the procedures <br />and, thus, cut response time. Usually, these written agreements include a process that takes the request <br />and response authorization down to a lower level in the organization, such as the Fire Chief or other <br />incident commander. By signing such agreements, communities are "pre -authorizing" the deployment <br />of their resources under specified circumstances as spelled out in the agreement. Most often, these <br />agreements are generally reciprocal in nature and rarely involve an exchange of money for service, <br />though they may include methods for reimbursement of unusual expenses for long deployments. <br />Automatic Aid Agreements <br />Once again, this form of mutual aid takes the process an additional step further by spelling out certain <br />circumstances under which one or more community's specific resources will respond automatically upon <br />notification of a reported incident in the neighboring community. In essence, automatic aid agreements <br />expand a community's initial first alarm response to certain types of incidents by adding resources from <br />a nearby neighbor to that response protocol. Typically, such agreements are for specific geographic <br />areas where the neighbor's resource can be expected to have a reasonable response time and are for <br />only specific types of incidents. An example of such an agreement would be having a neighboring <br />community's engine respond to all reported structure fires in an area where it would be closer than the <br />second or third -due engine from the home community. In other cases, the agreement might cover a <br />type of resource, such as a water tender or aerial ladder, than the home community does not possess. <br />An example of this would be having a neighboring community's water tender respond to all reported <br />structure fires in the areas of the home community that do not have pressurized hydrants. <br />Automatic aid agreements may be purely reciprocal or they may involve the exchange of money for the <br />services provided. Purely reciprocal agreements are common, but typically are used where each <br />community has some resource or service it can provide to the benefit of the other. These services or <br />4• Emergency Services Consnkilug page 67 <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.