Agenda - Council - 08/13/2013 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Ramsey, Nowthen, St. Francis, Oak Grove, and Bethel, Minnesota Feasibility Study for Shared or Cooperative Fire and Emergency Services Apparatus and Equipment Purchasing In concert with the above initiative, purchasing of fire apparatus and equipment can be shared, often resulting in significant cost savings and/or future cost avoidance. Joint Purchasing of Equipment and Apparatus I Timeline: Long term Objective: Create a single set of emergency apparatus specifications and provide for single -source uniform emergency apparatus for all study fire agencies. Summary Background: The study fire departments use and maintain a variety of emergency apparatus types and equipment such as self-contained breathing apparatus MBA), personal protective equipment (bunker gear, helmets, gloves, etc.), and all sorts of small and large tools and ancillary equipment . Among the common types of apparatus and equipment each department uses different makes, models, and configurations. A standard specification and procurement process for each apparatus and equipment type would result in lower cost, faster production, training efficiencies, and safer and more efficient scene operations. A joint purchasing program can also lead to a long-term program of sharing equipment across the region to enhance the capabilities of all participating departments. This could include ajoint capital replacement plan that encompasses all heavy rolling stock within the region. Policy Action: Use provided data on current multi -agency fleet to generate a comprehensive apparatus replacement schedule including agreed upon replacement interval and projected life expectancy of all equipment. Examine the potential of refurbishment, rehabilitation, or remounting of apparatus if feasible and evaluate technological updates necessary in small tools and safety equipment. Develop and follow a prescribed load list for apparatus standard equipment. Pro Con • The cost savings of purchasing a stock unit is often 20 percent or more when compared to a custom unit. • Consistency in equipment and compartments on apparatus can increase on scene efficiency and effectiveness. • Ease of training personnel from multiple agencies on use and operation of apparatus and equipment. • Apparatus can be painted in accordance with current department models without losing effectiveness of consistency in construction and operation. Fiscal Considerations: • Time and effort savings by preparing fewer bid specifications. • The prospect for conducting fewer bid processes. • Cost savings in acquiring emergency fire apparatus and equipment • Consider the purchase of stock versus custom apparatus. • Consider leasing versus outright purchase of emergency apparatus • Potential loss of customization by study agencies. • Long process of increasing consistency. • Specialization of apparatus based on community risk will impact certain equipment needs. page 116 *Emergency Servi.= consulting