Laserfiche WebLink
Ramsey, Nowthen, St. Francis, Oak Grove, and Bethel, Minnesota <br />Feasibility Study for Shared or Cooperative Fire and Emergency Services <br />Conclusion <br />Several of the study departments currently share certain services and work homogenously while all of <br />the study departments benefit from mutual aid responses from one another. Expanding the existing <br />spirit of cooperation to gain even more efficiencies is the next logical step. Given that the State of <br />Minnesota does not currently have legislation allowing the creation of special fire districts, a Joint <br />Powers Authority (JPA) appears to be the preferred method of joining the study agencies under a single <br />model of governance. Under this model, each municipality would retain its current level of control and a <br />methodology for funding the joint agency would be determined as the details are nailed down. The <br />following pros and cons should be considered with the JPA decision: <br />Pros: From a system design standpoint, service delivery is standardized, use of available <br />resources is maximized, and overall system proficiency is achieved. Further, under a JPA, each <br />entity maintains autonomy regarding taxation and each retains the ability to withdraw from the <br />agreement in the future. Each participant provides a defined financial contribution to the <br />operations of the JPA as outlined in the enabling documents. No legislative approval is required <br />for this type of agreement and the intergovernmental agreements created would define how <br />the JPA was governed as well as how each participant is represented. <br />Cons: The fact that each entity remains autonomous also presents a disadvantage. Since any <br />participant can withdraw at any time, there is no long-term, established commitment to the JPA. <br />The advantages realized by joining efforts may be reversed unexpectedly and long-range <br />planning is particularly difficult when the group is not sure what the JPA configuration may look <br />like in the future. <br />As part of a comprehensive implementation process, the issues of representation, funding, operations, <br />relief associations and others will be worked through and implemented by consensus of the <br />participating entities. While a JPA allows individual agencies to join and/or leave the combined <br />organization, for the optimum advantage and efficiency to be gained, all study departments would need <br />to participate. BFD, being located in the far northeast corner of the region is the least impactful but can <br />still provide a valuable service to eastern St. Francis and northern Oak Grove through mutual and <br />automatic aid or through a joint dispatch of the closest available unit. Oak Grove, however, is the most <br />impactful as it is, more or less, in the middle of the region and provides the needed central core <br />response resources to a regional system. While a continuation or even expansion of the current joint <br />t.Ereverleency Services Consulting <br />page 131 <br />