Laserfiche WebLink
CC Work Session 2. 2. <br />Meeting Date: 10/29/2013 <br />Information <br />Title: <br />PLANNING COMMISSION AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY BOARD (EPB): Review Status of Mississippi <br />River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA/Critical Area) Rulemaking Process by the Minnesota Department of Natural <br />Resources (DNR) as Directed by the 2013 Minnesota Legislature <br />(Anticipated Start Time = 6:30 p.m.) <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The purpose of this case is to seek consensus on a Statement ofPolicy document related to the Mississippi River <br />Corridor Critical Area Rulemaking Project. <br />In 2013, the Minnesota Legislature authorized the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to <br />commence rulemaking related to the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) (the "Critical Area"). The <br />intent is to update existing regulations found in Minnesota Statute Chapter 116G. The Critical Area extends from <br />Ramsey's western border south down to Hastings, stretching nearly seventy-two (72) miles and encompasses <br />approximately thirty (30) governmental subdivisions across the metro area. It is noted that these regulations <br />presently exist. The rulemaking process proposes to update these existing rules. <br />The Critical Area is an overlay district that establishes minimum development standards intended to provide <br />protections for the Mississippi River including, but not limited to, stormwater management, bluff stabilization, and <br />protection of scenic qualities. Minnesota Statute Chapter 116G establishes the district and requires that local <br />government units with land use and zoning authority adopt ordinances in substantial compliance with the Statute. <br />The local ordinance must be approved by the DNR. The local unit of government is responsible for administration <br />and enforcement. The City adopted its original ordinance in circa -mid 1980s. A majority of Ramsey is currently <br />classified as 'Rural Open Space' under existing rules. There are a number of existing lots and future development <br />scenarios under the City's Comprehensive Plan that conflict with this designation. <br />The rulemaking project originally commenced in 2009. However, the legislative timeframe expired, and updated <br />rules were never adopted. The 2013 Legislature revised the original scope for rulemaking and authorized a new <br />rulemaking project. Since some time has lapsed since the 2009 process, Staff is seeking policy direction on how to <br />approach participation in the rulemaking process. As there have been a number of years since the last discussion on <br />this rulemaking process, this is an opportunity to bring new members up to speed on the process, and ensure that <br />Staff brings the proper policy message forward in discussions with the DNR. One potential positive outcome is to <br />establish land use districts that are more compatible with existing development and planned future development <br />under the Comprehensive Plan. However, there is an opportunity that additional lawful, non -conforming structures <br />are created due to revised rules such as setbacks. Staff will need to fully analyze the impacts to Ramsey once the <br />final version of the draft rules are available. <br />The League of Minnesota Cities and Metro Cities (both organizations working with local governments) held an <br />introductory meeting with DNR staff and local communities. A second follow up meeting is scheduled for October <br />24, 2013. <br />Per City Council direction, the City held a collaborative public process for Ramsey residents on Monday, <br />September 16, 2013 to identify key issues, resources, barriers, and alternatives. The intent was not to formulate <br />support or opposition to the draft rules; the intent of the process was to identify key policy topics to help formulate <br />the City's policy stance. This was also an opportunity to identify where questions still remain to determine if certain <br />