Laserfiche WebLink
any way. Mr. Bendtsen supported keeping focused on repairing the roads and putting the costs <br />on property taxes. <br />William Kingston, 15760 Andrie Street NW, stated he read Ordinances #13 -21, -22, -23 for the <br />franchise fees and understands, based on the Work Session, that directives are to be achieved. <br />One is to spend franchise fees only on the SMP but none of the ordinances address that directive <br />or the five -year clause. He stated he asked previously about the administrative fees to handle the <br />franchise fee and it is clear in all three ordinances that there is the ability for the utility to tack on <br />a surcharge to administer the franchise fee so the end result may be an amount somewhat higher <br />than $8 per month per utility. Mr. Kingston stated the analysis has forgotten that the franchise <br />fee is a tax that is non - deductible from federal income taxes because it is a fee and not a tax. He <br />asked the Council to be clear to the public on what the Minnesota law will allow the City to do to <br />raise the levy. Mr. Kingston stated the analysis is ten years of $2.5 million, which indicates to <br />him that after the five -year term there will be a second franchise fee that is at a higher rate than <br />what is proposed today. <br />Merlin Hunt, 17860 Nowthen Boulevard, stated his ancestors moved to Anoka County in the <br />1850s and he grew up on 167th and Nowthen Boulevard until 1963. Then he lived out of State <br />until he decided to return to Ramsey where he grew up. Mr. Hunt stated his father was farming, <br />and whenever the County wanted something, they asked to buy right -of -way, and his father did <br />not have to pay any fees. The County paid the fees to him. Mr. Hunt stated it now seems like he <br />is always having to pay a fee and sometimes he thinks his dream of moving to Ramsey will turn <br />into a nightmare because residents are totally controlled in paying a fee on everything they do. <br />Mr. Hunt stated on franchise fees, he thinks it is the wrong direction. He noted that with the last <br />federal budget, President Obama refused to talk about it unless the rich were taxed, it was finally <br />done, and now it is being fought again. He stated the Minnesota Governor ran for election based <br />on taxing the rich and he has passed it. Mr. Hunt stated when he attended the open house, he <br />thought the franchise fee was a done deal but found it interesting that comparing franchise fee to <br />increasing property tax shows that a $250,000 home would pay the same amount as the franchise <br />fee if property taxes were increased to pay for the SMP. But, a person with a $100,000 home <br />will pay way more on a franchise fee than if the property taxes were increased. A person with a <br />$500,000 home pays more, but he felt they can afford more. Mr. Hunt said he heard someone <br />cannot afford the fees and that may be true with the owner of a $100,000 home or if struggling to <br />make mortgage payments. He stated if the taxes are increased based on the home, he would not <br />be hurt as much but the franchise fee is doing the opposite of what the President and Governor <br />did by taxing the poor instead of the rich. Mr. Hunt stated he will pay more on real estate tax <br />than the franchise fee, but can deduct it on his federal income taxes. He stated the City is trying <br />to be open by passing a franchise fee, but someone else mentioned he lives on CR 5 and has 40 <br />acres that do not touch a City street. The utilities come through his property and has an easement <br />to build and maintain the road but he owns it. Mr. Hunt stated the State law says that because the <br />City has right -of -way for streets and alleys, it can pass on a franchise fee. But, it does not say <br />anything about roads that are outside of the City's jurisdiction and just before the previous <br />franchise fee ended, he went to the County Attorney and tried to get it clarified that he (Mr. <br />Hunt) owns the land under the road and the County Attorney said the City of Ramsey has no <br />ownership influence or control over CR 5. Mr. Hunt asked how the City can apply a franchise <br />fee to him. The County Attorney said it is because he travels on the roads. Mr. Hunt asked how <br />City Council / October 8, 2013 <br />Page 10 of 24 <br />