Laserfiche WebLink
DRAINAGE PROBLEM IN <br /> MENKVELD'S COUNTRY PARK <br />By: Pete Raatikka, city Engineer <br /> <br />CASE <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Over the past several years with increased development in the area, <br />the ponding area on Lot 3, Block 4 in Menkveld's Country Park has <br />proven to be inadequate during periods of heavy rainfall or rapid <br />spring thaw. <br /> <br />On the weekend of March 10 and 11, 1990, a combination of rapid <br />spring thaw and heavy rainfall again caused flooding of Lots 2 and <br />3, Block 4, Menkveld's Country Park beyond' the limits of the <br />easement. As a result, I have received calls from the owner of Lot <br />3, Block 4 and a letter from Mr. Karl J. Yeager, attorney for the <br />owner of Lot 2, Block 4, questioning what measures will be taken <br />by the City to prevent future damages from the continuing drainage <br />problem. <br /> <br />During the fall of 1988, the city was proposing to increase the <br />volume of the ponding area by excavating it deeper and increase the <br />percolation rate by removing the impervious materials and replacing <br />them with pervious materials. The owners of Lot 3, Block 4, Mr. <br />and Mrs. Joe Kerkiede objected to the excavation of the easement <br />area due to potential safety hazards and appeared before City <br />Council on November 15, 1988. City Council directed the public <br />works superintendent and myself to meet with the Kerkiede's and <br />work out a solution acceptable to the Kerkiede's. <br /> <br />During the summer of 1989, the City's street department replaced <br />some of the impervious materials within the easement with pervious <br />materials to increase the percolation rate. However, due to the <br />mild winter with periods of freezing and thawing, the easement area <br />was substantially frozen to restrict percolation of runoff from the <br />March 10 and 11 rainfall. This situation was common in other areas <br />of the City which had dry wells or ponding areas and also in <br />numerous other communities. <br /> <br />To alleviate the drainage problem, the ultimate solution is the <br />installation of storm sewer to this area. Based on the City's <br />Comprehensive Drainage Plan, this area should drain south to County <br />Ditch No. 66. I have estimated the cost of such improvement to be <br />in the magnitude of $60,000. It is proposed that such an <br />improvement would be financed by the Rum River Storm Sewer Taxing <br />District in accordance with City Resolution 87-90. The first step <br />in initiating such a project would be to order a feasibility study. <br /> <br /> <br />