My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/12/2013
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2013
>
Agenda - Council - 11/12/2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 9:40:01 AM
Creation date
11/15/2013 10:43:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/12/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
495
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CC Regular Session <br />Meeting Date: 11/12/2013 <br />Submitted For: Grant Riemer, Engineering/Public Works <br />By: MaryJo Warner, Engineering/Public Works <br />Information <br />4. 15. <br />Title <br />Report from Public Works Committee. <br />1. Consider Stop Sign Request for Potassium Street and 143rd Circle: Ratify the recommendation of the Public <br />Works Committee to recommend that City Council deny the request for the installation of a stop sign at the <br />intersection of Potassium Street and 143rd Circle as it does not meet warrants. <br />2. Clarify Policy for Traffic Control on Modification Intersections: Ratify the recommendation of the Public Works <br />Committee to recommend City Council clarify Policy for traffic control on modified intersections by approving <br />Alternative #1: Follow the traffic engineer's plan for development (if available); and, Alternative #2: Staff initiate <br />the traffic study and follow the warrant recommendations in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices <br />(MUTCD) as a fall back alternative. <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The Public Works Committee held its regular meeting on October 15, 2013 and discussed the following two cases. <br />5:01: Consider Stop Sign Request for Potassium Street and 143rd Circle <br />Public Works Superintendent Riemer reviewed the staff report and petitioned request from residents living near the <br />intersection of Potassium Street and 143rd Circle for a stop sign at that intersection. City policy requires five <br />signatures from property owners within 500 feet of the traffic control modification and the petition as submitted did <br />meet that criterion. Public Works Superintendent Riemer presented statistics relating to traffic counts, accident <br />history, and warrants for stop signs. He stated staff feels this intersection does not warrant a stop sign at this time <br />based on documented traffic volumes and accident history. Staff recommends the Public Works Committee deny <br />the request for the installation of a stop sign at the intersection of Potassium Street and 14Jd Circle. <br />Motion to recommend that City Council deny the request for the installation of a stop sign at the intersection of <br />Potassium Street and 143rd Circle as it does not meet warrants. <br />5:02: Clarify Policy for Traffic Control on Modified Intersections <br />Public Works Superintendent Riemer explained the purpose of this case is to clarify City policy for the installation <br />of traffic control devices on an intersection that has been modified by adjacent development. It was noted that with <br />the Seasons of Ramsey townhome development nearing completion traffic patterns will be changed at two existing <br />intersections: Town Center Drive and 147th Lane on the west; and, Rhinestone street and 147th Lane on the east. <br />Three alternatives were presented for consideration: <br />Alternative #1: Follow the traffic engineer's plan for development (if available). <br />Alternative #2: Staff initiate the traffic study and follow the warrant recommendations in the Manual on Uniform <br />Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). <br />Alternative #3: Wait for residents to request traffic control and follow the City's current policy. <br />The current Policy is to require a petition from the surrounding area before the City initiates a traffic study. Staff is <br />requesting direction on what criteria should be used under these circumstances. Staff supports Alternative #1 with <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.