Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> <br />CASE <br /> <br />By: <br /> <br /> INTRODUCE HORSE ORDINANCE <br />Mark S. Banwart, Community Development Director <br /> By: Bill Goodrich, City Attorney <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />On February 22, 1989 at a special joint meeting of the City council, Planning and Zoning <br />Commission and the Park and Recreation Commission, Commissioner Shumway reviewed <br />in detail the proposed amendment to the Horse Ordinance that was denied by City council <br />in 1988. At the City Council meeting of March 14, 1989, City council directed staff to <br />provide further information regarding amendments to the current Horse Ordinance to be <br />presented at the March 28, 1989 Council meeting. For your information, attached is the <br />following: <br /> <br />A) Proposed Horse Ordinance <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />During the joint meeting of February 22, 1989, a number of concerns were stated by the <br />Commissioners and Council present. These included: Commissioner Hetland felt that the <br />manure controls proposed by the saddle club were more specific and should replace those <br />proposed in the draft ordinance. Some concerns were expressed regarding the <br />enforceability of the ordinance. The City Attorney stated that the horse ordinance would be <br />enforced similar to a nuisance ordinance; for which violation is a misdemeanor. City <br />Attorney Goodrich also stated that courts were not set up to impound horses and that a <br />Horseman's Committee as proposed in the draft ordinance could only be an advisory body <br />to the City Council. It was also noted that animal owners are liable for damages caused by <br />their animals and a discussion ensued regarding if current insurance should be something <br />that the City require of horse owners. It was also stated that the Horseman's Committee <br />would be required to maintain minutes pursuant to State Statute for any legally formed <br />entity within the City. Councilmembers DeLuca and Pearson expressed concern with <br />reducing the acreage requirements for keeping horses. The consensus of the Planning and <br />Zoning Commission members present were to make modifications to the proposed horse <br />ordinance before placing it on the City Council agenda for reconsideration. On April 4, <br />1989, the Planning and Zoning Commission directed Commissioner Terry Hendriksen to <br />make a presentation to City Council. <br /> <br />On April 25, 1989, the Ramsey City Council heard a presentation of Commissioner Terry <br />Hendriksen. The Council consensus was that the initial acreage increment should remain at <br />3 acres. Councilmember DeLuca was of the opinion that no horses should be allowed on <br />less than 3 acres South of the MWCC boundary. Council consensus was to place the horse <br />ordinance review on the May 9 council agenda for further discussion. <br /> <br />On May 2, 1989 at the Ramsey Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, Commissioner <br />Hendriksen stated that he made a presentation to City Council regarding the proposed <br />amendment to the horse ordinance. It appears that City Council is receptive to the idea of <br />allowing two horses on 3 acres and scaling up at a rate of one horse per 1/2 acre over 3 <br />acres. Council is also willing to consider allowing horses on 1.5 to 3 acre parcels with a <br />site plan that has been reviewed. Commissioner Hendriksen stated that he will redraft the <br />ordinance amendment based on the discussion with City Council, present that redraft to the <br />Planning and Zoning Commission at the May 16th Planning and Zoning Commission <br />meeting, and approach City Council with the revised amendment at a later date. <br /> <br /> <br />