Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />Union to meet and negotiate regarding this issue for the next <br />contract. If one of the parties refuses to conduct meaningful <br />negotiations then it is incumbent upon the other party to be more <br />specific in its proposed changes and amendments to the proficiency <br />test in a presentation to an interest arbitrator at the expiratio~ <br />of the new contract on December 31, 1990 if it should become <br />necessary so to do. <br /> <br /> As I noted above, the Union has offered to concede on this <br />issue if the proficiency pay percentage principle is retained. As <br />one will note I did not retain the percentage principle under <br /> <br />Issue 9 and thus there was no concession of the issue by the Union. <br /> <br />ISSUE 11 - WAGES - INVESTIGATIVE COMPENSATION - NEW <br /> <br />POSITION OF THE UNION <br /> <br /> The Union proposes to pay employees working as investigators <br />$125.00 per month in 1989 and $130.00 per month in 1990. <br /> <br /> The Union in its brief dropped its demand for pro rata <br />payments and proposed the following language: <br /> <br /> "Employees classified or assigned by the Employer to <br /> detective-investigator will receive $130.00 per <br /> month." <br /> <br />POSITION OF THE CITY <br /> <br /> The City does not have an investigative position, therefore, <br />the issue is not arbitrable under Minnesota Statutes 179A.07, <br />Subd. 1. <br /> <br />32 <br /> <br /> <br />