Laserfiche WebLink
].zl.~l.~!i]. Wc)].fr'am St. N.W. <br />Rams;ey, MN 553~)3 <br />I~qc:~ven',ber 14., ~988 <br /> <br />I~amsey C:i ty Coun¢:il <br />151,~i].!!; Iqowthen Blvd. NW <br /> <br />Ramsey? MN 55~503 <br /> <br />RECEIVED <br />NOV 1 1988 <br /> <br />r'e: plat ap~:.',rcrrval for' Cedar Hills development <br /> <br />I~" i~s my understa',ndir"~g that you will be cor~sidering <br />i~for'matior'~ about 'Ehe plat desiGin ~or the Cedar Hills <br />developmer'lt at the November 15 City Council meeting. <br /> <br />We have be~"~ resider'~ts of Htir'~ter~'s Hill for' over' 14 year's. <br />]in ~'hat time we I"~ave er-,joyed and appreciated the low tra4-fic <br />vc:~il, ume cr~ea~'ked by our plat design. <br /> <br />Il'lc existing p].ar'~ .For' Cedar Hills, Windemere Woods~ and the <br />llf'ic:~c~d Vail. u ].and wc~u:l.d have mar'~y detrimer'~tal e~fects on our <br />ne'.~g.l'-~l:).orl-~ood. 'l"here are only 28 families in this <br />~::;ev~y:~lopment. We f~.~r'~ded black'~.op roads +or our development <br />only one year' ago. lit would be unfair for us to have our <br />r'oads wor'r'~ out because of heavy traffic generated by 220-.23E~ <br />.~:amilie.~ .From the 3 pr-ol:)C:,sed pr(s, jects to the east o+ us. <br />Our' roads are hart'ow. We have deep ditches. We must pay <br />for the up[~:eep of our roacls. Many families here have sma].:[ <br />children. "l"heir safety is a major concern when so much <br />'t. ra.FfJ, c is ger'~era't, ed by projects such as these. <br /> <br />]"hese developmer'~ts should be l ool::ed at as a group.~ not as 3 <br />ir-~(J:i, vidual plat desigr-~s. Ar-~y approval for the total project <br />sh(,~ulct inc:l, ude a road south from Cedar- Hil'[.s to 116 and a <br />road west to 57 (an e)..'ter]s.~ior~ of 142nd Ave.) across the <br />r",c:,r'th side of the 4[Z~ acres directly south of Hunter's Hill. <br />i4:5, rd Ave. ~.n Hunter's Hill should remain a cul de sac. <br /> <br />A deve].o[)ment p].ar'~ ca~ [:)e der~ied if it adversely affects a <br />surrour-~dir~g neigl'~borhoc~d. ]: believe '~he current proposec~ <br />plans SHOUL.[) BE l)[~lxlIED unless the '~r'a~:ic problems are <br />adc:lr"e~.sed satJ. s.Fact(:)r:[:l.y ~o that riley do not have an adverse <br />a.~..~:ec'L or] '~'he SLtrrc:)ur~cli ng r',ei ghborhoods. <br /> <br /> <br />