My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 12/03/2013
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2010 - 2019
>
2013
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 12/03/2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 10:36:22 AM
Creation date
12/2/2013 9:55:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
12/03/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
351
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Public Works Committee 5. 2. <br />Meeting Date: 12/03/2013 <br />By: Grant Riemer, Engineering/Public <br />Works <br />Title: <br />Change in Institution Community Work Crew (ICWC) Contract <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The purpose of this report is to inform the Public Works Committee on the changes in the contract with the State of <br />Minnesota and the work crew that is contracted through the Department of Corrections. Over the past several years <br />the City of Ramsey has contracted with the Department of Corrections to use a work crew to help with various <br />public works activities. The work crew consisted of 6-8 inmates and a guard/crew leader. Activities the crew <br />performed included, mowing in our parks, striping athletic fields, cutting down diseased or damaged trees, chipping <br />brush, sod work, etc.... Under the current contract the ICWC works one day a week, normally Wednesday, and <br />work for 6-7 hours. The price of the current contract is $20,175.00, which is due to expire on 12/31/2013. The <br />Department of Corrections has informed the Public Works Superintendent that they have received several inquiries <br />from other cities requesting crews for additional days and for that reason they would not be able to renew our <br />contract. It is in their financial best interest to move our crew to where the greater demand is than to expend the <br />capitol needed to start up a new crew. The Department of Corrections has offered us a new contract where they <br />would provide us a crew on a "as needed basis" There would be no cost to the city, until we utilized a crew.That <br />cost would be $475.00/day for Monday -Thursday, and $67.50/hour for each overtime hour worked. They have a 4 <br />day work week schedule, so Friday would be considered overtime. Most crews would be busy Monday- Thursday, <br />so any crew we used would be more than likely at the overtime rate. <br />Timeframe: <br />10 minutes <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />Although there are advantages in using the ICWC, such as a large work force at a reasonable labor rate, there are <br />disadvantages as well. The work crew can not be split up. They all have to work in the same area where they can be <br />monitored by the guard. Their skill set is basically limited to manual labor, they are not allowed to run equipment <br />with the exception of power hand tools, so unless you have a very large project, people are not utilized to the fullest <br />extent. Staff would like to work with the finance department to re allocate the money ear marked for the ICWC in <br />the 2014 budget. Staff feels that the void left by the departure of the ICWC could best be filled by seasonal help or <br />contracted services. <br />Funding Source: <br />General Fund budget 0311-6315 and 0452-6315 <br />Recommendation: <br />Staff recommends entering into a one year contract with the Minnesota Department of Corrections for the <br />occasional hire of their work crew on an as needed basis and to work with finance to reallocate funding in the 2014 <br />general fund budget for either contracted services or temporary seasonal help. <br />Action: <br />Motion to accept staff recommendation and forward on to council for approval or <br />Motion to reject staff recommendation and choose an alternative based on committee discussion <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.