Laserfiche WebLink
Drafted byPatrick l3rama, Adopted?ih.XY/2033 <br />iii. Ramsey RDA Fund and Revolving I .oan Fund (Ri.F)* <br />iv. Anoka County LIRA Account <br />v. State Redevelopment Grant and Loan Program <br />vi. hand Write Down <br />vii. Sewer Trunk Fund* <br />The City will consider all financial assistance programs listed above for projects <br />that directly address existing blighted properties; see Appendix A: Primary .area <br />of Conceini. <br />The City will consider financial assistance programs vi-vii listed above for <br />projects that do not directly address existing blighted properties; see Appendix <br />A: Primary Area of Concern. <br />Utilization of financial assistance requires completion and approval of a <br />Business Subsidy Application by the Ramsey 1:1)A a.nd City Council. <br />* Sewer Trunk Fund, The 167/47 Node is not currently connected to City <br />sanitary sewer service. Through the City's Comprehensive Sewer and Water <br />Plan, it has been determined a trunk sanitary sewer line could he constructed to <br />serve the 167/47 Node in the future (estimated $1.5111 expenditure 2013). <br />However, the 167/47 Node sewer trunk line is identified as a special trunk line; <br />which means, it was not included in the pro forma to determine sewer trunk lees. <br />It is estimated, at full build out, the special 167/4'7 Node sewer trunk line would <br />recapture XXXXX dollars in sewer trunk fees (based on the pro forma). <br />Therefore, the City would be subsidizing XXXXX dollars, after collection of <br />sewer trunk fees, for the proposed trunk line. <br />the City does have sufficient dedicated funding available to construct said <br />sewer trunk line (City Sewer Fund balance estimated $3.4M 2013). In order to <br />replenish the City Sewer Fund, the City would only support an extension of the <br />sewer trunk line if a XXXXXXXX demand was created by new development. <br />[need council direction —may not be political support] <br />PUBLIC INPUT: <br />It is important to compile public input regarding the 167/47 Node before final adoption of ibis <br />document by the City Council. Two levels of public input are important to this process: (I) Property <br />Owners; and (II) Surrounding Property Owners. <br />A. Primary Proverty Owners: The City does support facilitating an ownership meeting <br />group to brainstorm options, share information and to investigate opportunities for <br />redevelopment and additional uses that are compatible with the surrounding residential <br />area. This effort will be led by the Economic Development Authority (EDA). <br />Palley far Guiding Development Participation: 167/47 Retail Node jDR41 r] Page 3 of 5 <br />Project Summary — 167th Avenue Node at Saint Francis Boulevard <br />