Laserfiche WebLink
This sentence authorizes the Council to set franchise fee rates. More generally, <br />section 7.1 of the Charter grants the Council "full authority" over the City's <br />financial affairs. Note also that section 1.2 grants the City all statutory powers <br />unless otherwise indicated in the Charter, and as stated above, the City has <br />statutory authority to enact franchise fees. There are no provisions in the Charter <br />that prevent or restrict the Council from imposing such fees. <br />3. A reference to any present City ordinances pertaining to franchise fees. <br />We are not aware of any current City ordinances that directly pertain to franchise <br />fees. <br />4. A summary of metro area and a few outstate charter provisions and <br />ordinances that pertain to the establishment or amendment of franchise fees. <br />5. Indicate whether there are any distinctions between charter cities and other <br />cities when it comes to enacting franchise fees upon its residents. <br />The only distinction would be if a city's charter contained some sort of limitation <br />or regulation of franchise fees. Absent such provisions, there are no differences <br />between charter and non - charter cities. <br />6. Please address the effect of the Charter Commission amending the Charter <br />on October 21, 2013, on the present ordinance proposal by the City <br />pertaining to franchise fees. <br />The Charter Commission cannot amend the Charter on October 21st. Almost all <br />charter amendments must be approved by the voters at an election. The exception <br />is if the Commission proposes an amendment and the Council enacts it by <br />ordinance by unanimous vote. Even then, due to notice and hearing requirements <br />and a 90 -day delay for the effective date, it takes months for the amendment to <br />take effect. See Minn. Stat. § 410.12. In the meantime, any franchise fee <br />ordinance approved by the Council will remain in effect. <br />7. Address whether there has been any legal challenges to franchise fees <br />established for repairing roadways. Does there have to be any correlation <br />between the fee and the right -of -way use by a utility? Could a franchise fee <br />exceed the cost of road repair? <br />The franchise statute, section 216B.36, does not mandate any correlation between <br />the amount of the fee and the utility's use of the right -of -way. The statute <br />